Monday, May 18, 2026

Final Events IV: Chapter I Continued: Satire Und Theology Version

Final Events IV: Chapter I Continued

REDFERN, NICK (2010) Final Events: And The Secret Government Group On Demonic UFOS And The Afterlife, San Antonio/New York, Anomalist Books.

Preface

Edited with significant revisions 20260516

Finishing up with Chapter I..

Previous entries for context

Monday, January 18, 2021: Final Events III: Chapter 1 Review

Thursday, August 27, 2020: Final Events II: Introduction Continued

Friday, August 07, 2020: Final Events I: Introduction

Introduction

Author Redfern explains that Ray Boeche, an Anglican priest and Rector at Celebration Anglican Church in Lincoln, Nebraska, is also the founder and former director of the Fortean Research Center. He is as well a former Nebraska State Director for the Mutual UFO Network. In 1991, Boeche, after being contacted, met with two United States Department of Defense physicists in regards to the subject of UFOs. (I). 

Redfern learned about these meetings when he met Boeche in 2006 and then interviewed him in 2007. (I). The book states Boeche had a shorter, and then a longer meeting with the two physicists from the Department of Defense. (I). This led to Boeche being 'plunged headlong into a strange and surreal world of classified Department of Defense projects, secret meetings and follow-up dialogues...'(2). 

What was presented to Boeche from these Department of Defense physicists was descriptions of NHE's or Non-Human Entities, which many within UFO research and analysis reason are aliens (extraterrestrials, my add). (2). However, in contrast, certain persons within the Department of Defense reason these are 'deceptive minions of Satan.' (2).

The two men Boeche met with were 'physicists' (2). They were both Christians and while working for the US Department of Defense, an aspect of their work was to contacts NHE's. (2). The next part of this text is revealing:

Quote:

'And part of this effort was to try and control the NHE's and use their powers in military weapons applications and in intelligence areas, such as remote-viewing and psychotronic weapons.' (2).

These two Department of Defense, physicists reasoned the NHE's 'were not extraterrestrial at all; they believed they were some sort of demonic entities.' (2). Further the scientists stated that all the benevolent or beneficial contacts with these entities were 'tainted'. (2). Eventually the results of the contacts worked out to be 'bad'. (2). The scientists therefore viewed these encounters as demonic as opposed to extraterrestrial. (3). From a biblical context, the entities were viewed as deceivers of humanity. (3).

The two scientists that held to Christian faith and philosophy reasoned that others with the US Department of Defence were 'being lulled into a false sense of security' (4). The text explains that the supposed technology provided by the NHE's, such as psychotronic weapons and remote viewing was not really being done by the Department of Defence, but the entities 'were always the causal factor'. (4). 

Chapter I: Thee Quest Begins- Continued

The book written in 2010, explains that the author, Redfern, since meeting with Boeche has 'dug deep into the central theme of his revelations.' (8). Redfern states that this secretive group of American government, military, and intelligence employees collectively call themselves the 'Collins Elite'.

Redfern opines

Quote:

'Yet for all their military-swagger, ingrained machismo. and bravado, the Collins Elite live in a perpetual state of overwhelming apprehension, fear and absolute dread.' (8).

This state of mind arises from the actions of what this group perceives as 'hostile and ominous intruders from a realm of existence far different than the one we now inhabit..' (8). According to the Collins Elite, states Redfern these aliens/extraterrestrials are not 'friends and allies' (8) of humanity. (8).

Interesting

Quote:

'In essence, the Collins Elite utterly refute and reject any and all notions that extraterrestrials have ever visited planet Earth or have abducted human beings for the purposes relative to medical examination, scientific study, and hybridization-a scenario that many UFO researchers strongly assert is taking place. Instead, the conclusion of the group is that we have in our midst a cold-hearted and sinister intelligence of demonic origins that masquerades as alien, whose presence in our world threatens each and every one of us, and that consigns all of us to, perhaps quite literally a living hell.' (8).

I will continue to work through this chapter within my next  related entry however: I note that at the end of this chapter Redfern explains 'the accounts, beliefs, theories and conclusions that I have uncovered are strictly those of the people who have been willing to have them published. (11). Redfern is providing a message as a messenger. (11).

Academically, it would better to have primary citations from people such as Boeche, the Collins Elite and the United States, Department of Defense. That being stated, I am reviewing this book as a secondary source, and do not academically dismiss it as such.

My expertise is not in UFO research or the occult. But biblically and theologically, I am at least, allowing the intellectual possibility the United States, Department of Defense has been dealing with demonic entities pretending to be aliens. I realize this is less palatable than actual extraterrestrials for many within present, Western and American, secular worldviews. I am claiming no level of relative certainty here in regards to the content of the book under review...

Replace religion

Redfern explains that the Collins Elite has fear and suspicion that through these interactions with the extraterrestrials the human race is being convinced to abandon 'the teachings of religion.' (9). Rather, it is a belief in Satan himself that is being pushed by these alien entities under 'the deceptive guise of an advanced alien entity.-as our savior, shortly before our countdown to Armageddon beings...'(9).

This is connected to UFOlogy and the aliens known as the Grays. (9). Within the Department of Defense and the US government are officials that desire to engage these extraterrestrials in order to make use of alien technologies. (9-10). Quote: 'a technology that appears to be a strange, magical brew comprised of truly advanced science, ancient alchemy, and archaic rite and ritual. (10).

Many secular humanists that deny the relevancy and truthfulness of God's revelation through the Hebrew Bible and New Testament, manuscripts and translations, making up the Bible, would find UFOlogy more palatable within a worldview than a biblical faith and philosophy. However, this approach to UFOlogy requires plenty of faith, including assuming the benevolence and wisdom of extraterrestrials that directly or indirectly allow their extraterrestrial science and weaponry to be used by, in the case under review, the United States government. Note, that not all that study UFOlogy would necessarily consider the Grays or all extraterrestrials benevolent. For example, the author of the book under review, seemingly has his doubts. But, in the context of their acceptance by those in leadership in the US government, Department of Defense, the aliens are considered well-meaning. Or let us state, at least, they are considered useful by leadership within the Department of Defense.

Replacing 'the teachings of religion'. The Cambridge Dictionary defines religion as 'the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or any such system of belief and worship:'

Definition of religion from the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary.

When I read or hear about 'religion' being replaced, this strikes me as coming from a source that does not take Religious Studies, Philosophical of Religion, Theology, including Philosophical Theology, and Biblical Studies, as serious academic disciplines. Those of Christian faith and worldview, within the Collins Elite are stating that these supposed extraterrestrials mark all human religion as false and claim that their own worldview is of intellectual superiority. In doing this they advise those within the Collins Elite and those in the know in the Department of Defense, to adopt the worldview presented by the extraterrestrials. But philosophically and practically, this is supposed, finite, alien, entities of greater technological and scientific knowledge, leading finite, human beings in what I view as error. 

If they are actual aliens working with the American military and the Department of Defense, or there are actual aliens that exist, these entities are still finite, created, beings. From my perspective as a philosophical theologian and philosopher of religion; if is stated, as I have read many times, that the aliens created human beings, I ask then who made the aliens? An infinite regress of causes is a vicious regress when it does not solve its own problem. A benign regress solves it own problem, just as infinite plus or minus numbers are not real things, but represent real things. In the Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Simon Blackburn discusses ‘infinite regress’ and mentions that this occurs in a vicious way whenever a problem tries to solve itself and yet remains with the same problem it had previously. Blackburn (1996: 324).

Why should these finite extraterrestrials be assumed to be definitively and definitely, correct about worldview because they are advanced technologically and scientifically?

They evolved? From what?

Who created these aliens? 

Problems with finite, evolved, aliens that claim to be the sole source of humanity

Scientifically

Scientifically, time, space and matter are finite. The 'big bang theory' is a cosmological theory that all matter and energy in the universe originated from a state of enormous density and temperature 'that exploded at a finite moment in the past' where space and time came into existence. (Oxford Dictionary of Science: 85). According to the Oxford Dictionary of Science, the universe will eventually have a heat death. (386). When entropy is maximized and 'all large-scale samples of matter are at a uniform temperature.' (386). Future 'heat death' indicates a finite universe. Stating that aliens evolved does not reasonably explain their origins.

Philosophically

Philosophically to avoid a vicious regress, a first cause exists, that is of absolute necessity in any possible world. This God is infinite (where not logically contradictory), eternal, beyond finite, time, space and matter, yet able to interact within creation. 

Theologically

Theologically, God, is where a reasonable, human, hope, faith and trust should reside, especially through revelatory means. This as opposed to human hope, faith and trust in other finite entities, fictional or non-fictional. Extraterrestrial, extradimensional, it does not matter, a finite explanation is not a good one.

Biblically

Biblically, the sinful fall of humanity (Genesis, Romans, Galatians, Hebrews, Revelation, as examples) leads to significant error. This was influenced by the serpent in Genesis 3, likely Satan. Satanic deception continues in the earthly realm.

Genesis 3:6 (NASB)

'When the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was desirable to make one wise, she took from its fruit and ate; and she gave also to her husband with her, and he ate.'

This describes the biblical fall.

Romans 3:23 (NASB) 

'For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God...'

a) Or sinned

Sinful thoughts and actions led to the fall.

Romans 5:12 (NASB) 

'Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned...' 

Sinful thoughts and actions led to the fall and a corrupted human nature.

Romans 6:23 (NASB)

'For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.'

From the fall, there is sin and death, which according to the New Testament, can only be covered by the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ for those who embrace this by grace through faith.

Galatians 3:10 (NASB) 

'For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written, 'Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them.'

a) Or law

No one perfectly obeys the law of God from the Hebrew Bible. The New Covenant in Jesus Christ, through grace through faith, provides applied atonement and resurrection to believers.

Galatians 3:22 (NASB) 

'But the Scripture has confined [a]everyone under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.' 

a) Lit all things 

The law shows sin, it does not save people from sin, only the applied work of Jesus Christ, does that...

Revelation 20:12 (NASB)

'And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged from the things which were written in the books, according to their deeds.'

a) Or scrolls

b) Or scroll

c) Or scrolls

Bible Hub: Revelation 20: 12 

Cited

GRK: θρόνου καὶ βιβλία ἠνοίχθησαν καὶ 

NAS: the throne, and books were opened;

βιβλία (biblia)

Deeds will be tainted due to sinful human nature, thoughts and actions.

Revelation 20: 14-15 (NASB)

14 Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. 15 And if [d]anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.

d) Lit anyone was not

Admittedly, there are significant levels of figurative language used to describe Hades and the lake of fire. But Hades and the lake of fire do not provide the common grace humanity was given in this present earthly realm. This is everlasting negative judgement, outside of the atoning and resurrection, gospel work of Jesus Christ.

Revelation 22:3 (NASB)

'There will no longer be any curse; and the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and His bond-servants will serve Him...'

Willingly serving him, guided by God.

According to the New Testament, this fracture of sinful, fallen nature, is only repaired through the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ for believing humanity by grace through faith alone. Human good works should occur within salvation, they do not cause salvation.

For by grace you have been saved through faith; and [a]this is not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

a) this salvation

Archives: Vicious Regress

Archives: First Cause


Religion vs Religions

In regards to disproving 'religion', not only is the claim of finite, supposed alien entities insufficient as a worldview marker, the facts are that there are various 'religions' within the world. A sweeping generalization dismissing all belief in god, gods, God (my add) and the supernatural (my add), that leads to worship is not philosophically convincing. For example, I do not hold to any form of Islam, Hinduism, Mormonism or the Jehovah's Witnesses. If I was to use reason to hold to various premises and conclusion (s) within an argument, or simply hold to various statements that disproved these religious views, it does not disprove 'religion'. It disproves these 'religions'. I hold to biblical Christianity within the Reformed tradition. Comparing views within Reformed tradition and disagreeing and even disproving other Christian views on points would not dispose of 'religion'. It would not disprove all movements within Christianity as I would still be defending my Reformed views. Ridding the world of significant, reasonable Christianity takes a lot more intellectual merit than can be provided through supposed, created, finite aliens. The infinite cause of all things should be considered far more seriously...
---

BLACKBURN, S. (1996) ‘Regress’, in Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BRADLEY, RAYMOND D. (1996) ‘Infinite Regress Argument’, in Robert Audi, (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS (2008) Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

CONWAY DAVID A. AND RONALD MUNSON (1997) The Elements of Reasoning, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York. 

CRAIG, WILLIAM LANE, (1991)(2006) ‘The Existence of God and the Beginning of the Universe’,Truth: A Journal of Modern Thought 3 (1991) 85-96. http://www.leaderu.com/truth/3truth11.html pp. 1-18.

FRAME, JOHN M. (1999) ‘The Bible on the Problem of Evil: Insights from Romans 3:1-8,21-26; 5:1-5; 8:28-39’, IIIM Magazine Online, Volume 1, Number 33, October 11 to October 17, Fern Park, Florida, Third Millennium. 

FRAME, JOHN M. (2002) The Doctrine of God, P and R Publishing, Phillipsburg, New Jersey. 

LANGER, SUSANNE K (1953)(1967) An Introduction to Symbolic Logic, Dover Publications, New York.

Oxford Dictionary of Science, (2010), Sixth Edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London.

REDFERN, NICK (2010) Final Events: And The Secret Government Group On Demonic UFOS And The Afterlife, San Antonio/New York, Anomalist Books.

SHEDD, WILLIAM G.T. (1874-1890)(1980) Dogmatic Theology, Volume 1, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Publishers. 

SHEDD, WILLIAM G.T. (1874-1890)(1980) Dogmatic Theology, Volume 2, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Publishers. 

TIME ALMANAC 2013 (2012) Chicago.

Sunday, April 26, 2026

Final Events III: Chapter 1 Review: Satire Und Theology Version

Final Events III: Chapter I

Preface

Part three of a book review I began 20210118. I have revised part one and two and continue this process 20260426.

a Previously

Thursday, August 27, 2020: Final Events II: Introduction Continued

Friday, August 07, 2020: Final Events I: Introduction

Author Redfern explains that Ray Boeche, an Anglican priest and Rector at Celebration Anglican Church in Lincoln, Nebraska, is also the founder and former director of the Fortean Research Center. He is as well a former Nebraska State Director for the Mutual UFO Network. In 1991, Boeche, after being contacted, met with two United States Department of Defense physicists in regards to the subject of UFOs. (I). 

Redfern learned about these meetings when he met Boeche in 2006 and then interviewed him in 2007. (I). The book states Boeche had a shorter, and then a longer meeting with the two physicists from the Department of Defense. (I). This led to Boeche being 'plunged headlong into a strange and surreal world of classified Department of Defense projects, secret meetings and follow-up dialogues...'(2). 

What was presented to Boeche from these Department of Defence physicists was descriptions of NHE's or Non-Human Entities, which many within UFO research and analysis reason are aliens (extraterrestrials, my add). (2). However, in contrast, certain persons within the Department of Defence reason these are 'deceptive minions of Satan.' (2).

b August 27, 2020

The two men Boeche met with were 'physicists' (2). They were both Christians and while working for the US Department of Defense, an aspect of their work was to contacts NHE's. (2). The next part of this text is revealing:

Quote:

'And part of this effort was to try and control the NHE's and use their powers in military weapons applications and in intelligence areas, such as remote-viewing and psychotronic weapons.' (2).

These two Department of Defense, physicists reasoned the NHE's 'were not extraterrestrial at all; they believed they were some sort of demonic entities.' (2). Further the scientists stated that all the benevolent or beneficial contacts with these entities were 'tainted'. (2). Eventually the results of the contacts worked out to be 'bad'. (2). The scientists therefore viewed these encounters as demonic as opposed to extraterrestrial. (3). From a biblical context, the entities were viewed as deceivers of humanity. (3).

The two scientists that held to Christian faith and philosophy reasoned that others with the US Department of Defence were 'being lulled into a false sense of security' (4). The text explains that the supposed technology provided by the NHE's, such as psychotronic weapons and  remote viewing was not really being done by the Department of Defence, but the entities 'were always the causal factor'. (4). 

January 18, 2021: Chapter I: The Quest Begins

The book written in 2010, explains that the author, Redfern, since meeting with Boeche has 'dug deep into the central theme of his revelations.' (8). Redfern states that this secretive group of American government, military, and intelligence employees collectively call themselves the 'Collins Elite'.

Redfern opines

Quote:

'Yet for all their military-swagger, ingrained machismo. and bravado, the Collins Elite live in a perpetual state of overwhelming apprehension, fear and absolute dread.' (8).

This state of mind arises from the actions of what this group perceives as 'hostile and ominous intruders from a realm of existence far different than the one we now inhabit..' (8). According to the Collins Elite, states Redfern these aliens/extraterrestrials are not 'friends and allies' (8) of humanity. (8).

Interesting

Quote:

'In essence , the Collins Elite utterly refute and reject any and all notions that extraterrestrials have ever visited planet Earth or have abducted human beings for the purposes relative to medical examination, scientific study, and hybridization-a scenario that many UFO researchers strongly assert is taking place. Instead, the conclusion of the group is that we have in our midst a cold-hearted and sinister intelligence of demonic origins that masquerades as alien, whose presence in our world threatens each and every one of us, and that consigns all of us to, perhaps quite literally a living hell.' (8).

I will continue to work through this chapter within my next related entry however: I note that at the end of this chapter Redfern explains 'the accounts, beliefs, theories and conclusions that I have uncovered are strictly those of the people who have been willing to have them published. (11). Redfern is providing a message as a messenger. (11).

Academically, it would better to have primary citations from people such as Boeche, the Collins Elite and the United States, Department of Defense. That being stated, I am reviewing this book as a secondary source, and do not academically dismiss it as such.

My expertise is not in UFO research or the occult. But biblically and theologically, I am at least, allowing the intellectual possibility the United States, Department of Defense has been dealing with demonic entities pretending to be aliens. I realize this is less palatable than actual extraterrestrials for many within present, Western and American, secular worldviews. I am claiming no level of relative certainty here in regards to the content of the book under review.

What if there are actual aliens?

If they are actual aliens working with the American military and the Department of Defense, or there are actual aliens that exist, these entities are still finite, created, beings. From my perspective as a philosophical theologian and philosopher of religion; if is stated, as I have read many times, that the aliens created human beings, I ask then who made the aliens? An infinite regress of causes is a vicious regress.

Time is caused by time, is caused by time, is caused by time, ad infinitum, is an infinite regress. It is a vicious regress, because it does not solve its own problem and requires a first cause, without a cause. 

(If there is an infinite distance between Los Angeles and New York, one will never arrive in New York, is also a similar problem of vicious regress) 

In the Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Simon Blackburn discusses ‘infinite regress’ and mentions that this occurs in a vicious way whenever a problem tries to solve itself and yet remains with the same problem it had previously. Blackburn (1996: 324) 

A vicious regress is an infinite regress that does not solve its own problem, while a benign regress is an infinite regress that does not fail to solve its own problem. Blackburn (1996: 324). Blackburn writes that there is frequently room for debate on what is a vicious regress or benign regress. Blackburn (1996: 324). An example of a benign regress is infinite numbers both plus and minus, as they in reality represent conceptualized things as opposed to being real things. 'Problem' solved. Therefore: Based on my philosophical reading and Blackburn's explanation, it can be deduced that philosophers would debate whether a particular vicious regress is illogical and whether it is using a logical fallacy. 

Further: An argument can be logical and not sound, as sound arguments are not the only valid arguments but are those where 'all the premises are true'. (1997: 35). Whether or not a particular vicious regress, and the examples I raised, are illogical and using a logical fallacy in the sense of invalid argument is of secondary importance. It is of primary importance when a vicious regress is not reasonable and does not solve its own problem and is fallacious as in faulty reasoning. Bradley (371) mentions that it is not illogical, and not a vicious regress that each act of free choice is caused by another act of free choice. I agree that it is not necessarily illogical, but disagree that the argument as described is not a vicious regress.

If there are actual aliens, then like all that is finite, they are created by the infinite, eternal, uncaused, first cause, God. If they are in obedient, relationship, fellowship and respectful worship with God, they are not going to counter and contradict the gospel message for humanity. Even if aliens had created human beings, which is really, extremely far-fetched, in my mind, especially as the biblical revelation supports that humanity has a physical/spiritual nature; the human being's ultimate moral accountability would still be to the first cause creator, not alien entities. In other words, opining that aliens created humanity does not eliminate moral accountability to a first cause, God, for either the aliens or humanity.

As I state somewhat satirically, for the human being post-mortem:

Is it heaven or hell, or the NHL

(I read that in a cartoon as a child)

Brief on Satan

Satan is also known as the devil and other biblical names. But in this limited website context, in regards to Satan, according to Greek scholar, Walter Bauer:

σαταν ὁ,indeclinable (no change of form of word, my add)  and σατανᾶς  ὁ, ᾶ (Bauer 744).

Walter Bauer (1979) in agreement with Strong, Strong (1890)(1986: 152), describes ‘Satan’ or ‘Satanas’ as the Adversary, enemy of God and those who belong to God. Bauer (1979: 744). Bauer goes on to note that Revelation, Chapter 2, verse 13, is describing Satan as persecuting the Church. Bauer (1979: 745). It appears by studying the Greek copies of the New Testament and assuming a type of contextual, literal hermeneutical method of examining Scripture, it is possible to view satanic beings as literal and historical beings…

Bible Hub: Encyclopebia of the Bible–Satan

'Bibliography F. C. Jennings, Satan: His Person, Work, Place and Destiny (n.d.); D. L. Cooper, What Men Must Believe (1943), 234-279; E. Langton, Satan, A Portrait, A Study of the Character of Satan Through All the Ages (1945); L. S. Chafer, Systematic Theology, II (1947), 33-112; C. T. Schwarze, The Program of Satan, A Study of the Purpose and Method of the Adversary (1947); K. L. Schmidt, “Luzifer als gefallene Engelsmacht,” TLZ, VII (1951), 261-279; J. M. Ross, “The Decline of the Devil,” ExpT, LXVI, No. 2 (Nov. 1954), 58-61; F. J. Rae, “The Two Circles of Faith,” ExpT, XLVI, No. 7 (Apr. 1955), 212-215; D. G. Barnhouse, The Invisible War (1965); J. Kallas, The Satanward View (1966); F. A. Tatford, The Prince of Darkness (1967); F. J. Huegel, The Mystery of Iniquity (1968); J. D. Pentecost, Your Adversary, the Devil (1969).'

Cited 

'The NT reveals that Satan is the ruler over a powerful kingdom of evil which he rules with intelligent consistency. In refuting the charge that he was casting out demons by the power of Beelzebul, Jesus pointed out the absurdity of the charge since it meant that Satan “is divided against himself; how then will his kingdom stand?” (Matt 12:26).'  

Courson opines that this charge against Jesus Christ was both illogical and hypocritical (89). I take it by illogical, Courson means, contradictory, as God would be working against himself in Christ. Hypocritical because the Pharisees were supposedly also working on God's behalf. But in reality, this religious leaders were being deceived by their own sinful natures and by Satanic entities opposed to the Son of God and his gospel work. 

Back to Bible Hub: Encyclopebia of the Bible–Satan

Cited 

'Satan is also described as “the ruler of this world” (John 12:31). The “world” (κόσμος, G3180) which he rules is the present world system organized according to his own principles, methods, and aims...'

Courson explains that because of the gospel, the believer in Jesus Christ can grasp onto God and Satan will be cast out. (542).

Satan is called the god of this world (2 Corinthians 4: 4). According to Courson, Satan must be bound for people to be set free (1114). He explains that we should pray that the work of Satan is bound (1114) and that the power of God is loosed (1114).

Back to Bible Hub: Encyclopebia of the Bible–Satan

Cited 

'In his ambition to assume the place of God Satan is mastered by a consuming passion to receive worship as God. That master passion was revealed in Satan’s bald offer to invest Jesus with authority over the kingdoms of this world on condition that He would worship him.' (Matthew 4, Luke 4 my add).

Satan is looking for God level worship, pretending to be the leader of aliens, and deceiving some within humanity, might suffice.

a From a liberal perspective

According to Richardson, the term 'satan' does indeed mean 'adversary'. (521). He reasons that in the oldest Hebrew Bible contexts, Satan was a member of the heavenly court (521). Richardson writes that in Job 1, Satan's function was to 'identify evil persons and to accuse them before God.' (521). Of course, the hypocrisy, and contradiction here is that in Job 1 from the New American Standard Bible (NASB), Job is described as...

'There was a man in the land of Uz whose name was Job; and that man was blameless, upright, fearing God and turning away from evil.'

Meanwhile the likely first description of Satan in Genesis 3, is of a deceptive serpent. Even if Job was written before Genesis, the Genesis story precedes the Job story. 

b Genesis v Job

There is some debate in scholarship which book was written first. John J. Collins lists a traditional view of the writing of Genesis as 1400 BC, with the typical more modern view of final completion with final revisions as 400 BC. (pp. 53-70). 

For the book of Job, Hartley argues for a date in the 7th century, roughly 625–600 BCE (11). Terrien opines that Job was likely written in the 5th century BCE and that is was written during the suffering of the Jewish people after the Babylonian exile (361). Williams opines that there is a significant scholarly view that reasons a final version of Job was extant, between 500 and 300 BCE, while acknowledging the much older oral traditions it is based on (26). I am not convinced with a limited review that Job was written and revised before Genesis was written and revised.

The conduct of Satan within Genesis and Job calls what is black, white, and what is white, black. Or just mixing things up to be wrongly grey at times. I am not stating that at times things are not in the grey area, but if things are grey, they should not be deceptively grey. 

c From a liberal perspective continued

Richardson continues that by New Testament times Satan's character had been 'degenerated'  (521), and Satan was shown as the leader of demonic forces (521). Richardson explains that once the enlightenment era (roughly 1700-1800, my add) came an intellectual belief in a person Satan became less prominent among thinkers. (522). Well, this can be explained as roughly from 1700 forward there has been less trust in the scripture and revealed, supernatural truth from God. This theological truth through his prophets, apostles, scribes, and in particular through the life and death of God the Son, God incarnate, Jesus Christ. There has also been, of course, simultaneously, intellectually connected, less trust in a Christian Church that would teach biblical dogma and doctrine that held to such scriptural revelation. 

Richardson reasons that Satan and satanic forces were not a 'satisfactory answer to the problem of evil' (522). Being a scholar on the nature of God, problems of evil, free will and determinism, through MPhil/PhD theses and twenty plus years of online work, I would not, and do not opine that Satanic forces are the answer to the cause of the problem of evil. That is too simplistic, I would view God as willingly, with holy motives creating humanity that would fall, without force or coercion, with satanic influence. Please see my online work in regards to compatibilism and incompatibilism.

God as primary cause with perfectly good motives with all thoughts and actions.

Humanity and Satanic entities as secondary causes, with tainted, sinful motives, to varying degrees, in all thoughts and actions.

The human being, as regenerate can be guided by the Holy Spirit of God to work within God's sovereign plans, not perfectly, but still significantly obediently.

Religious history shows that atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ, through his death on the cross, is applied to the regenerate, elect, that would eventually as resurrected, comprise the culminated Kingdom of God. Richardson asks how evil could get into a world that God made 'very good' (522). An answer is that the development of atoned for, resurrected believers within the eventual culminated Kingdom of God, is also considered 'very good' by God. At the same time, God willingly allowing some of his creation, some of them angelic entities (demonic) and some of them human beings, to reject and oppose God and the gospel, could be considered within God's sovereign plans. I reason that God does not want people within his culminated Kingdom of God to everlastingly seriously ponder on possibly not needing God as Lord, and instead trusting in our finite goodness and righteousness (before God). There is an actual alternative in reality, to being a citizen of the Kingdom of God, by grace through faith alone. It is called 'hell'. Death, along with Hades (hell 1) are cast into the Lake of Fire (hell 2) (Revelation 20). Figurative literal language, but with some level of literalness describing post-mortem stages of everlasting separation from God. The second death.

Comments

If the story presented by Redfern is significantly true, again I do not claim relative certainty, the behavior of the evil entities is consistent with the nature and work of biblical, satanic beings. In particular, with ontological deception (nature of existence). Biblically, Satan is the deceiver of the whole world (Revelation 12:9: NASB). Satan as the serpent, deceived humanity in Genesis 3, and he with hypocrisy accuses Job of wrong doing in Job 1, where Job, even as a sinner, is nowhere as wicked as Satan. The potential prospect of fake aliens/extraterrestrials attempting to gain human reliance on these entities through the use of great power which also leads to human fear of that same power, is reasonable. The American authorities within the military and government, the hold to forms of naturalism, that dismiss the supernatural and the gospel as relevant, rather could view the knowledge and technology of these 'aliens' as more beneficial than harmful.

For me, I support the West militarily. I appreciate that NATO should be advancing weaponry for defensive purposes. I very much realize that the law, order, and significant freedom within the West that is protected through military technology. I understand and support reasonable secrecy for Western security with military and government. I do not reason military and government secrets should all be an open book. I am a loyal supporter of the Western alliance. But I primarily, also stand with the triune God of the Bible and reason that the infinite, eternal, God should be taken very seriously. At the same time, the documented, biblical existence of finite, everlasting, Satan and his opposition to God and the gospel, also should be taken very seriously. Note, Satanic forces are not for the betterment of humanity, in any context, including if they are indeed pretending to be aliens. They are attempting to lead humanity to death, outside of gospel salvation and to everlasting damnation. Courson explains that in regards to Revelation 20: 14-15, 'all whose names are written in the Book of Life-win.' (1784).

Revelation 20:14-15 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

14 Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire. 15 And if [a]anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire. 

Footnotes Revelation 20:15 Lit anyone was not
---

BAUER, WALTER. (1979) A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, Translated by Eric H. Wahlstrom, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

BLACKBURN, S. (1996) ‘Regress’, in Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BRADLEY, RAYMOND D. (1996) ‘Infinite Regress Argument’, in Robert Audi, (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1539)(1998) The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book II, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids, The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College.

CALVIN, JOHN (1539)(1998) The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids, The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College.

CALVIN, JOHN (1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

COLLINS, JOHN J. (2004)(2014) Introduction to the Hebrew Bible, Minneapolis, Fortress Press.

CONWAY DAVID A. AND RONALD MUNSON (1997) The Elements of Reasoning, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York.

COURSON, JON (2005) Application Commentary, Thomas Nelson, Nashville.

HARTLEY, JOHN E. (1988) The Book of Job, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1990) The Book of Revelation, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

RICHARDSON, ALAN (1999) 'Satan', in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Limited.

STRONG, J. (1986) Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Pickering, Ontario, Welch Publishing Company.

TERRIEN, SAMUEL (1978) The Elusive Presence: Toward a New Biblical Theology, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

WILLIAMS, ANTHONY (1996) Job, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Saturday, March 07, 2026

Final Events II: Introduction Continued: Satire Und Theology Version

Final Events II: Introduction Continued

This book review continues:

REDFERN, NICK (2010) Final Events: And The Secret Government Group On Demonic UFOS And The Afterlife, San Antonio/New York, Anomalist Books.

Introduction continued 

Previously

Friday, August 07, 2020: Final Events I: Introduction

Author Redfern explains that Ray Boeche, an Anglican priest and Rector at Celebration Anglican Church in Lincoln, Nebraska, is also the founder and former director of the Fortean Research Center. He is as well a former Nebraska State Director for the Mutual UFO Network. In 1991, Boeche, after being contacted, met with two United States Department of Defense physicists in regards to the subject of UFOs. (I). 

Redfern learned about these meetings when he met Boeche in 2006 and then interviewed him in 2007. (I). The book states Boeche had a shorter, and then a longer meeting with the two physicists from the Department of Defense. (I). This led to Boeche being 'plunged headlong into a strange and surreal world of classified Department of Defense projects, secret meetings and follow-up dialogues...'(2). 

What was presented to Boeche from these Department of Defense physicists was descriptions of NHE's or Non-Human Entities, which many within UFO research and analysis reason are aliens (extraterrestrials, my add). (2). However, in contrast, certain persons within the Department of Defense reason these are 'deceptive minions of Satan.' (2).

August 27, 2020

The two men Boeche met with were physicists (2). They were both Christians and while working for the US Department of Defense, an aspect of their work was to contacts NHE's. (2). The next part of this text is revealing:

Quote:

'And part of this effort was to try and control the NHE's and use their powers in military weapons applications and in intelligence areas, such as remote-viewing and psychotronic weapons.' (2).

These two Department of Defense, physicists reasoned the NHE's 'were not extraterrestrial at all; they believed they were some sort of demonic entities.' (2). Further the scientists stated that all the benevolent or beneficial contacts with these entities were 'tainted'. (2). Eventually the results of the contacts worked out to be 'bad'. (2). The scientists therefore viewed these encounters as demonic as opposed to extraterrestrial. (3). From a biblical context, the entities were viewed as deceivers of humanity. (3).

The two scientists that held to Christian faith and philosophy reasoned that others with the US Department of Defense were 'being lulled into a false sense of security' (4). The text explains that the supposed technology provided by the NHE's, such as psychotronic weapons and  remote viewing was not really being done by the Department of Defense, but the entities 'were always the causal factor'. (4).

Opinion

I am not a UFO: Unidentified Flying Objects or NHE: Non-Human Entities, expert. I make no dogmatic claims on the subject, or on the particular existence of such entities, but I will defend reasonable theology and reasonable theistic philosophy of religion. This is a book review.

I am just beginning the review of this text, but if the Department of Defense scientists are correct that these entities were (are) demonic and therefore multidimensional/extradimensional as opposed to extraterrestrial; deception in acts and actions, from these entities, is indeed to be expected. Human beings, especially the unregenerate (John 3, Titus 3, 1 Peter, for the regenerate) do not typically significantly understand the supernatural realm. Or if they have an intellectual, but not regenerate understanding, do not navigate properly, the supernatural realm. The demonic entities, as do God's angels, have significant knowledge of the supernatural realm and the natural realm. As demonic entities, the fallen angels (2 Peter 2, Revelation 12: 7-9) serve Satan in both supernatural and natural realms. Angels serve the triune God, God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit in both supernatural and natural realms. The regenerate in contrast to the unregenerate, have been enlightened by God and embrace the atoning and resurrection work of God the Son, applied to them.

Demonic entities have the upper hand in any dealings with the Department of Defense or any other human entity that does not embrace the power of Almighty God through the gospel for protection from the powers of darkness. A key is to humbly as finite and sinful humanity, seek the biblical God as opposed to seeking human knowledge and wisdom, alone, while interacting with extraterrestrial or extradimensional entities which too are finite. The entities as finite, are not eternal. If these entities are not under direct submission to the eternal, infinite, God, and have rebelled against God, they are tainted by evil.

Non-exhaustive examples: New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Matthew 6:13 

13 ‘And do not lead us into temptation, but deliver us from [a]evil. [b][For Yours is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever. Amen.’] 

Footnotes 

a Matthew 6:13 Or the evil one 

b Matthew 6:13 This clause not found in early mss 

Ephesians 6:11 

11 Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil.

2 Thessalonians 3:3 

3 But the Lord is faithful, [a]and He will strengthen and protect you [b]from the evil one.

Footnotes

a 2 Thessalonians 3:3 Lit who will 

b 2 Thessalonians 3:3 Or from evil

James 4:7 

7 Submit therefore to God. Resist the devil and he will flee from you.

1 John 5:19 

19 We know that we are of God, and that the whole world lies in the power of the evil one.

World = κόσμος = cosmos

Here 
κόσμος appears to be not only our world system, but also our planet and universe. In other words, wherever humanity has dominion, Satanic beings are also operating.

Bible Hub

Cited 

HELPS Word-studies 

2889 kósmos (literally, "something ordered") – properly, an "ordered system" (like the universe, creation); the world. [The English term "cosmetic" is derived from 2889 /kósmos, i.e. the order ("ensemble") used of treating the face as a whole.]

---

BLACKBURN, S. (1996) ‘Regress’, in Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BRADLEY, RAYMOND D. (1996) ‘Infinite Regress Argument’, in Robert Audi, (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 

CONWAY DAVID A. AND RONALD MUNSON (1997) The Elements of Reasoning, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York.

COURSON, JON (2005) Application Commentary, Thomas Nelson, Nashville.

CRAIG, WILLIAM LANE, (1991)(2006) ‘The Existence of God and the Beginning of the Universe’,Truth: A Journal of Modern Thought 3 (1991) 85-96. http://www.leaderu.com/truth/3truth11.html pp. 1-18.

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1729)(2006) Sovereignty of God, New Haven, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards Center, Yale University.

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1731-1733)(2006) Law of Nature, New Haven, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards Center, Yale University.

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1754)(2006) Freedom of the Will, Flower Mound, Texas. Jonathanedwards.com.

ERICKSON, MILLARD (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

ERICKSON, MILLARD (2003) What Does God Know and When Does He Know It?, Grand Rapids, Zondervan. 

FRANCE, R.T. (1985) Matthew, Grand Rapids, IVP, Eerdmans.

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1990) The Book of Revelation, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London.

SLICK, MATTHEW J. (2006) 'A logical proof that Mormonism is false', Meridian, Idaho, Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry, http://www.carm.org/lds/infinity.htm 

SMITH, JOSEPH (1844)(2006) ‘Sermon by the Prophet-The Christian Godhead-Plurality of Gods’, History of the Church, Vol. 6, p. 473-479. http://www.utlm.org 

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy,Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

TOLHURST, TOLHURST, WILLIAM (1996) 'Vicious Regress', in Robert Audi, (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Wikipedia Review 


Updated 20260307 from a version on Dr. Russell Norman Murray

Final Events I: Introduction: Satire Und Theology Version

Amazon
Final Events I: Introduction

Archives


Updated 20260703 from Dr. Russell Norman Murray

Preface

My good friend, Mr. JCZ bought me 'Final Events' for my birthday, so as it has arrived, I will begin a book review series and consider how it progresses. This has me with four book reviews at present on this website, plus other theological, philosophical and biblical issues I research, analyze and write on that come to mind. Many are subjects that I continue to work on over the years.

My MPhil and PhD research was in regards to problems of evil, theodicy, free will, determinism and the nature of God, and I continue to write on these subjects. I embedded a biblical, Reformed solution to problems of evil within my British, PhD thesis.

My Mom has recently passed and so I have extra work to do with estate issues and will be producing shorter articles for now.

REDFERN, NICK (2010) Final Events: And The Secret Government Group On Demonic UFOS And The Afterlife, San Antonio/New York, Anomalist Books.

Mr. Redfern is a full-time author, lecturer and journalist. (Back cover). 


For decades, stories of alien abductions, UFO encounters, flying saucer sightings, and Area 51 have led millions of people to believe that extraterrestrials are secretly among us. But what if those millions of people are all wrong? What if the UFO phenomenon has much darker and far more ominous origins? For four years, UFO authority Nick Redfern has been investigating the strange and terrifying world of a secret group within the U.S. Government known as the Collins Elite. The group believes that our purported alien visitors are, in reality, deceptive demons and fallen angels. They are the minions of Satan, who are reaping and enslaving our very souls, and paving the way for Armageddon and Judgment Day. 

In FINAL EVENTS you'll learn about the secret government files on occultists Aleister Crowley and Jack Parsons, and their connections to the UFO mystery; revelations of the demonic link to the famous "UFO crash" at Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947; the disclosure of government investigations into life-after-death and out-of-body experiences; and an examination of the satanic agenda behind alien abductions. FINAL EVENTS reveals the stark and horrific truths about UFOs that some in the government would rather keep secret. 
---

Introduction

Author Redfern explains that Ray Boeche, an Anglican priest and Rector at Celebration Anglican Church in Lincoln, Nebraska, is also the founder and former director of the Fortean Research Center. He is as well a former Nebraska State Director for the Mutual UFO Network. In 1991, Boeche, after being contacted, met with two US Department of Defense physicists in regards to the subject of UFOs. (I).

Redfern learned about these meetings when he met Boeche in 2006 and then interviewed him in 2007. (I). The book states Boeche had a shorter, and then a longer meeting with the two physicists from the Department of Defense. (I). This led to Boeche being 'plunged headlong into a strange and surreal world of classified Department of Defense projects, secret meetings and follow-up dialogues...'(2).

What was presented to Boeche from these Department of Defense physicists was descriptions of NHE's or Non-Human Entities, which many within UFO research and analysis reason are aliens (extraterrestrials, my add). (2). However, in contrast, certain persons within the Department of Defense reason these are 'deceptive minions of Satan.' (2).

The Reverend Boeche has a website.

Dr. Raymond W Boeche

Cited 

Founder and former director of the Fortean Research Center, The Reverend Dr. Raymond W. Boeche has been involved in the study of unexplained phenomena since 1965. He has served as Nebraska State Director for the Mutual UFO Network, on the Board of Advisors for Citizens Against UFO Secrecy, and in various capacities with numerous other organizations around the world, involved in the study of unexplained phenomena. 

Boeche has delivered juried papers at two MUFON International Symposia; was retained by the University of Nebraska as a consultant to organize, host, and present research papers at two major international conferences on the unexplained in 1982 and 1983. He has had numerous articles published, as well 4 books: a collection of his writings, "An Anthology of the Unexplained"; "The Collected Annals of the Journal of the Fortean Research Center"; "Bloodless Cuts: The Complete Collected Works of Thomas R. Adams"; and "A Time to Stand: When Government Turns Its Back on God." 

Boeche is well-known as one of the primary investigators of the 1980 Bentwaters (UK) UFO incident. He is also recognized for his extensive work in the areas of animal mutilations, out-of-place animal sightings, Bigfoot reports, the Men-in-Black phenomenon, and occult religions and philosophies.

His research has often been cited in national publications such as Omni and Fate magazine, and in books by researchers such as Loren Coleman, Janet and Colin Bord, Jenny Randles, Jerome Clark, Timothy Good, and others. He has contributed to the Time-Life book series Mysteries of the Unexplained, the LBS Communications production "UFO Coverup. . . Live!" for the Fox Television Network, and Guennette Productions’ Home Box Office special, "UFO’s, What on Earth is Happening?"
He helped produce and host a popular weekly radio call-in talk show, Exploring Unexplained Phenomena for three years, is a frequent guest on other talk shows, and a popular speaker on theology and the unexplained. 

Cited 

As a theologian and apologist, Dr. Boeche headed an outreach to the academic community and the 'New Age' movement called "Reasonable Defense" from 1987 through 1994.
---

Opinion

From my non-exhaustive research, both Mr. Redfern and Dr. Boeche appear as legitimate researchers on the subject of UFOs and their possible ontological sources. As a theologian and philosopher of religion, I find it very interesting that representatives and physicists (these two physicists were both Christians, page 2), from the US Department of Defense would consider extradimensional alternatives to extraterrestrial UFO theory. I shall continue with the Introduction from the book in a future article.
---
BLACKBURN, S. (1996) ‘Regress’, in Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BRADLEY, RAYMOND D. (1996) ‘Infinite Regress Argument’, in Robert Audi, (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 

CONWAY DAVID A. AND RONALD MUNSON (1997) The Elements of Reasoning, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York.

CRAIG, WILLIAM LANE, (1991)(2006) ‘The Existence of God and the Beginning of the Universe’,Truth: A Journal of Modern Thought 3 (1991) 85-96. http://www.leaderu.com/truth/3truth11.html pp. 1-18.

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1729)(2006) Sovereignty of God, New Haven, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards Center, Yale University.

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1731-1733)(2006) Law of Nature, New Haven, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards Center, Yale University.

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1754)(2006) Freedom of the Will, Flower Mound, Texas. Jonathanedwards.com.

ERICKSON, MILLARD (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

ERICKSON, MILLARD (2003) What Does God Know and When Does He Know It?, Grand Rapids, Zondervan. 

LANGER, SUSANNE K (1953)(1967) An Introduction to Symbolic Logic, Dover Publications, New York. 

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London.

SLICK, MATTHEW J. (2006) 'A logical proof that Mormonism is false', Meridian, Idaho, Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry, http://www.carm.org/lds/infinity.htm 

SMITH, JOSEPH (1844)(2006) ‘Sermon by the Prophet-The Christian Godhead-Plurality of Gods’, History of the Church, Vol. 6, p. 473-479. http://www.utlm.org 

TOLHURST, TOLHURST, WILLIAM (1996) 'Vicious Regress', in Robert Audi, (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Wikipedia Review