Saturday, January 31, 2026

The Orthodox Study Bible: Brief on Colossians-Author/Authorship: Satire Und Theology Version

The Orthodox Study Bible: Brief on Colossians-Author/Authorship

Preface

Previously

Monday, August 09, 2021 The Orthodox Study Bible: Brief on Colossians-Author/Gnosticism archive search gnosticism 

This is the second article within this Colossians review. There are several reviews of this scholarly book and bible, overall, on this website from my Reformed, non-Orthodoxy, perspective.

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

Author/Authorship

Quoting the Orthodox Study Bible:

'All early testimony credit Paul with the authorship of Colossians. Some of the vocabulary is unusual for Paul because he is combating first-century Gnosticism using its own terminology--thereby deepening his own understanding of Christ.' (461).

N.T. Wright

On the issue of the authorship of Colossians, Wright explains that 'scholarly opinion is by no means unanimous on the point.' (31). He further opines that 'There is not even agreement on where the weight of argument must lie if the issue is to be settled.' (31). 

More from N.T. Wright in the next related article...

Wales

From my own academic background, I can opine that biblical and academic schools of thought develop and some followers within these schools of thought become rather dogmatic in his/her position. After finishing my MPhil research thesis only degree at the University of Wales, Bangor, now Bangor University, after a few months, I moved on to the University of Wales, Lampeter, now the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David (UWTSD), Lampeter campus, for my PhD research thesis only degree studies. Now to be clear, UWTSD was at the time very highly rated in the United Kingdom specifically for PhD thesis research in Theology. My work was equally within the academic disciples of Theology and Philosophy of Religion.

I have mentioned in my website work in the archives, how at the first meeting in 2004 at the Lampeter campus, in my mind, I was the only philosophical theologian/philosopher of religion in the entire group. From my theological perspective, as a group they seemed to be biblical scholars and some might have been biblical theologians, secondarily. Admittedly, they had academic credentials I did not have, and vice-versa. But, when I gave my short lecture on problems of evil, theodicy, free will and determinism, I faced many blank stares, and was instead asked questions in regards to biblical interpretation.

One kind PhD student from our group, was nice to enough to host me at Lampeter and opined that the Apostle Paul, definitely (rather dogmatically) did not write certain New Testament books accredited to him. All these texts, he stated (paraphrased) were inspired through God the Holy Spirit and still scripture, but written by an unknown associate (s) of Paul and credited to Paul. 

I opined, submitting to his scholarship in this area, that there was of course debate in regards to author and authorship, and that it could in some cases, be a scribe writing on behalf of the Apostle Paul. Paul is documented to have eye issues within the New Testament. 

Dr. Mike Bagwell


Cited 

'(We think Paul seldom wrote with his own hand … after this eye disease reached its peak! His huge Epistle to the Romans, by ancient letter standards, was written by another hand, though Paul dictated the words! “I Tertius, who wrote this epistle, salute you in the Lord.” Romans 16:22, in the Epistle’s very last paragraph! This Tertius must have been a “hired” scribe.)

(And even here in Galatians, when Paul “signs” this Letter at its end … he is forced to write in very large letters! Again evidence of failing sight! “Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand.” Galatians 6:12, the “letters of the alphabet being discussed, not the length of the Galatian “Letter,” which is relatively short by Paul’s standards.)'
---

From the New King James Version (NKJV) which is used by the Orthodox Study Bible

Romans 16:22

22 I, Tertius, who wrote this epistle, greet you in the Lord.

Galatians 6:11 

11 See with what large letters I have written to you with my own hand! 

Reasonably from the two New Testament examples provided by Dr. Bagwell, the Apostle Paul at times, at least, used a scribe or scribes. Certainly this must be considered in evaluating authorship.

Felix Just S.J, PhD (1999-2002, 2012)


Cited

'The seven “Undisputed Letters” (a.k.a. the “Authentic Pauline Letters”). These can be put into three subgroups chronologically: 

The Earliest Letter (ca. 50-51 AD): 1 Thessalonians 

The Middle Letters (mid 50's): 1 Corinthians, 2 Corinthians, Philippians, Philemon, Galatians 

The Latest Letter (ca. 57-58 AD): Romans About 95-99% of scholars today agree that all of these letters were actually written by Paul himself.' 

Cited 

'The six “Disputed Letters” (a.k.a. the “Deutero-Pauline Epistles”). 

For two of these, the scholarly divide is about 50/50 (that is, about 50% of scholars think they were written by Paul himself, while the other 50% think they are “pseudepigraphic” or written later by a follower of Paul): 

If 2 Thessalonians is authentic, Paul probably wrote it soon after 1 Thess (in order to correct some misunderstandings caused by 1 Thess itself), since it is so similar in form and content to 1 Thess.

If Colossians is authentic, Paul probably wrote it near the end of his life (after spending several years in prison), since the theology expressed in it is rather different from Paul's earlier letters. 

If either or both of these letters are pseudepigraphic, then they were probably written in the last few decades of the first Christian century. 

For the other four letters, about 80% of scholars think they were not written by Paul himself, but by one of his followers after his death: Ephesians is almost definitely a later expansion of Colossians, since they are so similar in structure and theology, but quite different from Paul's earlier letters; 

Ephesians was probably written to serve as a “cover letter” for an early collection of Pauline letters.

The Pastoral Epistles (1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus) were most likely written late in the first century by some member(s) of the “Pauline School” who wanted to adapt his teachings to changing circumstances. 

Note: Judging a particular letter to be pseudepigraphic does not mean that it is any less valuable than the other letters, but only that it was written later by someone other than Paul.

All thirteen of the letters attributed to Paul are still considered “canonical”; all of them are still part of the Holy Bible and foundational for the Christian Church. 

Distinguishing the letters based on actual authorship, however, allows scholars to see more clearly the development of early Christian theology and practice. 

The so-called Epistle to the Hebrews is definitely not written by Paul, and is not even explicitly attributed to him. 

For centuries, many Christians counted it as the fourteenth work in the Pauline corpus, mainly because the epistolary ending mentions Timothy, Paul's closest associate (see Heb 13:23). 

However, contrary to all other letters and epistles, the opening of Hebrews does not name its author at all. 

In literary genre, therefore, Hebrews is not really a “letter”; rather, it is a “homily” (a scripture-based sermon).'

Colossians Bibliography from Felix Just S.J, PhD (1999-2002, 2012)

Brown, Raymond E. An Introduction to the New Testament. New York: Doubleday, 1997. - "Letter to the Colossians" (pp. 599-619), "Epistle (Letter) to the Ephesians" (620-637)
MacDonald, Margaret Y. Colossians and Ephesians. Sacra Pagina 17. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical. Press, 2000. 
Schnackenburg, Rudolf. The Epistle to the Ephesians. Edinburgh: Clark, 1991. 
Lincoln, Andrew T. Ephesians. Word Biblical Commentary. Dallas: Word, 1990. 
Lohse, Eduard. Colossians and Philemon: A Commentary on the Epistles to the Colossians and to Philemon. Hermeneia Commentary. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971.
---




Evangelical and conservative pastors and scholars will tend to view Pauline authorship as legitimate for all the New Testament books concerned. The Grace Fellowship Church link cites GUNDRY, ROBERT (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

Referencing the disputed texts with dates provided....

2 Thessalonians 50-51 Paul 
Colossians 61-62 Paul 
Ephesians 61-62 Paul
1 Timothy 63-64 Paul 
Titus 63-64 Paul 
2 Timothy 65 Paul

Canonicity within the Christian Church, the twenty-seven books contains the same basic Gospel and theology. Contrary texts have been weeded out by Church Fathers. This is why I can be in basic agreement with my colleague from Wales and the Catholic source that wrote:

'All thirteen of the letters attributed to Paul are still considered “canonical”; all of them are still part of the Holy Bible and foundational for the Christian Church. '
---

To be continued...

References

ASHBY, E G. (1986) 'Colossians' in The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan. 

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Oxford Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

ERICKSON, MILLARD (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

GRENZ, STANLEY J., DAVID GURETZKI and CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press. 

GUNDRY, ROBERT (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

KLEIN, WILLIAM W., CRAIG, C. BLOMBERG, AND ROBERT L. HUBBARD, JR. (1993) Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, London, Word Publishing. 

MARSHALL, ALFRED (1975)(1996) The Interlinear KJV-NIV, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

PAYNE. DAVID F.(1986) Jude, in F.F. Bruce, (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Marshall Pickering/Zondervan.

STRONG, J. (1890)(1986) Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Burlington, Welch Publishing Company.

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

WILSON, R. MCL (1999) ‘Gnosticism’, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Ltd.

WRIGHT, N.T., Colossians and Philemon, (1986)(1989), IVP, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids.

Edited 20260131 from original website

Saturday, January 24, 2026

The Orthodox Study Bible: Brief on Colossians-Author/Gnosticism: Satire Und Theology Version

The Orthodox Study Bible: Brief on Colossians-Author/Gnosticism

Preface

While listening to a King James Version (KJV) of Colossians online, which is reasonably close in content to the New King James Version (NKJV) used by the Orthodox Study Bible; I reasoned it would be interesting to review some of the perspectives on Colossians, from Orthodoxy and work at a series of articles.

This while I have already been chipping away at reviewing various sections of the Orthodox Study Bible on my academic website. Again my perspective is within the Reformed tradition.

I will not promise that I will deal with the standard scholarly issues. As more usual than not, I tend to deal with what I find interesting and this is prayerfully as the Lord leads. As usual in a Blogger format, this project will be non-exhaustive. 

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

Author

Quoting the Orthodox Study Bible:

'All early testimony credit Paul with the authorship of Colossians. Some of the vocabulary is unusual for Paul because he is combating first-century Gnosticism using its own terminology--thereby deepening his own understanding of Christ.' (461).

Gnosticism

archive search gnosticism 

Edited from previous versions with some new material

R. MCL. Wilson in the ‘Gnosticism’ entry in A New Dictionary of Christian Theology notes it is the term used to describe a religious movement that existed during the early Christian era. The gnosis was considered a special knowledge of God and the nature of humanity. This gnosis would provide a person with the power to be free from negative cosmic forces. Wilson (1999: 226). 

Klein, Blomberg, and Hubbard explain within Introduction to Biblical Interpretation that although gnosticism existed in the first century, it did not become a full-fledged philosophy until the second and third centuries. Klein, Blomberg, and Hubbard (1993: 382). 

British Philosopher, Simon Blackburn, with the Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy defines Gnosis from the Greek meaning knowledge. The root word is found in the words/concepts agnosticism, gnosticism, diagnosis, prognosis and the obsolete word for epistemology, gnoseology. Blackburn (1996: 159). In the academic discipline of theology, gnosis is noted by Blackburn to be considered higher knowledge of spiritual things, referencing claims of such knowledge within gnosticism. Blackburn (1996: 159). 

Browning again from Oxford, but this time the Oxford Dictionary of the Bible, writes that gnosis, meaning knowledge, and gnosticism is a term used for 'a kind of religious speculation in vogue in the first two centuries CE'; the Church Fathers being hostile to it because of a perceived opposition to orthodox (Biblical, in context, my add) Christianity. Browning (1997: 151). 

Gnosticism was a broad movement that did have influence over the Church, particularly in the second century states Grenz, Guretzki and Nordling. Gnosticism would emphasize the spiritual realm over the material realm which was considered evil, often claiming it needed to be escaped. Pocket Dictionary (1999: 56). 

Edward Moore, author, St. Elias School of Orthodox Theology, Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy: A Peer-Reviewed Academic Resource 

Cited

'Gnosticism (after gnôsis, the Greek word for “knowledge” or “insight”) is the name given to a loosely organized religious and philosophical movement that flourished in the first and second centuries CE. The exact origin(s) of this school of thought cannot be traced, although it is possible to locate influences or sources as far back as the second and first centuries BCE, such as the early treatises of the Corpus Hermeticum, the Jewish Apocalyptic writings, and especially Platonic philosophy and the Hebrew Scriptures themselves.' (Edward Moore)

Edward Moore listed sources 

Dillon, John (1977). “Numenius of Apamea” in The Middle Platonists (Cornell University Press). 

Filoramo, Giovanni. A History of Gnosticism, tr. Anthony Alcock (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers 1990, 1992). 

Hegel, G.W.F. “The Gnostics” in Lectures on the History of Philosophy, vol 2. “Plato and the Platonists,” tr. E.S. Haldane and Frances H. Simson (University of Nebraska Press; Bison Books Edition 1995). 

Jonas, Hans (1958, 2001). The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity (Boston: Beacon Press). 

Layton, Bentley (1987). The Gnostic Scriptures (Doubleday: The Anchor Bible Reference Library). 

Plato. Laws, tr. Trevor J. Saunders, in Plato: Complete Works, ed. John M. Cooper (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing 1997). 

Plato. Timaeus, tr. Donald J. Zeyl, in Plato: Complete Works. 

Plotinus. The Enneads, tr. A.H. Armstrong, in 7 volumes (Harvard: Loeb Classical Library 1966). 

Ricoeur, Paul. The Conflict of Interpretations (Northwestern University Press 1974). 

Rudolph, Kurt. Gnosis: The Nature and History of Gnosticism, tr. Robert McLachlan Wilson (Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark Ltd. 1984). 

Segal, Robert A. (ed.) The Gnostic Jung (Princeton University Press 1992).

Bible Hub 1108 gnósis 

Cited 

'Strong's Concordance 

gnósis: a knowing, knowledge 

Original Word: γνῶσις, εως, ἡ 

Part of Speech: Noun, Feminine Transliteration: gnósis 

Phonetic Spelling: (gno'-sis) 

Definition: a knowing, knowledge Usage: knowledge, doctrine, wisdom.' 


Englishman's Concordance

Cited

Colossians 2:3 N-GFS (Noun-Genitive, Feminine, Singular, my add)
GRK: σοφίας καὶ γνώσεως ἀπόκρυφοι (σοφίας of wisdom καὶ and γνώσεως of knowledge ἀπόκρυφοι hidden, my add using Marshall text)
NAS: the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.
KJV: of wisdom and knowledge.
INT: of wisdom and of knowledge hidden

References

ASHBY, E G. (1986) 'Colossians' in The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan. 

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Oxford Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

ERICKSON, MILLARD (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

GRENZ, STANLEY J., DAVID GURETZKI and CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press. 

KLEIN, WILLIAM W., CRAIG, C. BLOMBERG, AND ROBERT L. HUBBARD, JR. (1993) Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, London, Word Publishing. 

MARSHALL, ALFRED (1975)(1996) The Interlinear KJV-NIV, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

PAYNE. DAVID F.(1986) Jude, in F.F. Bruce, (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Marshall Pickering/Zondervan.

STRONG, J. (1890)(1986) Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Burlington, Welch Publishing Company.

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

WILSON, R. MCL (1999) ‘Gnosticism’, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Ltd.

WRIGHT, N.T., Colossians and Philemon, (1986)(1989), IVP, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids.

Next related article, I will research and write more on the issue of the authorship of Colossians, where 'scholarly opinion is by no means unanimous on the point.' N.T. Wright page 31.

Thursday, January 01, 2026

The Orthodox Study Bible: The Bible and the Orthodox Church: Satire Und Theology Version

The Orthodox Study Bible: The Bible and the Orthodox Church

Preface

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy,Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

Purchased from my former employer, the Canadian Bible Society @ the former Cafe Logos, Vancouver.

This text review continues...

Most citations paraphrased, in my own words, using British thesis academic standards. A British tutor of mine taught me that it was more academic to cite sources in my words and I have stayed with that approach. An American academic that unofficially reviewed my PhD thesis, opined that my thesis lacked word for word citations. But my work was reviewed in Wales...

The Bible and the Orthodox Church 

Section I: The Bible and the Orthodox Church (i)

This Orthodox Study Bible explains that outwardly the Holy Scriptures occupy a position of great prominence (i). It is then noted that the 'Gospel Book' rests on the Holy Alter throughout the week. (i).

Immediately, the ceremonial nature of Orthodox worship (as with the Roman Catholic Church) is differentiated from less formal evangelical (movement not a church) and evangelical/Reformed churches. Mainline Christianity perhaps can generally be considered less formal than Orthodox or Roman Catholic and more formal than evangelical or evangelical/Reformed? There is variance within these church movements. I am not being exhaustive here in evaluation, but for example, typically in an evangelical church there is no 'Holy Alter' as part of a church service.

Within Orthodoxy the Gospel Book and icons may be venerated. This is spiritual, reverence and respect shown toward the saint depicted on an icon. The Gospel Book can also be venerated showing reverence and respect for those within the biblical text, based on the same theology. As an academic, seeking a significant level of objectivity, I can grant the Orthodox premise that veneration is not worship.

From the Orthodox Study Bible

Do the icons of Orthodoxy border on idolatry? (xvi).

I can accept the Orthodox claim the icons are never worshipped, only venerated, as in historical characters depicted, shown respect. (xvi). The text explains its view that Orthodoxy is very serious in regards to obeying the second commandment from the Hebrew Bible that (paraphrased) prohibits forms of idolatry, such as the worship of a craved image. (xvi). In regards to reverence, related to prayer, it is my theological, biblical view that Jesus Christ, as God-man, via the Trinity, within the Christian Church, is our source of applied atonement and resurrection for those in Jesus Christ, and this eliminates the need for any human, finite mode of veneration. Granted, the incarnate Christ is humanly finite, but is also the fullness of deity in bodily form. Paraphrased from Colossians 2:9-10 (NASB).

New American Standard Bible (NASB) 

Hebrews 9: 15 For this reason He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that, since a death has taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were committed under the first covenant, those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. 

Hebrews 12:24 and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood, which speaks better than the blood of Abel. 

My deduction is veneration to the Saints is also a supposed form of mediation in some cases, within Orthodoxy, at least. But mediation is presented in the book of Hebrews, and theologically I view it as taking place through Jesus Christ that is both infinite, eternal, holy, God and incarnated perfect man. Mediation should be directed toward God. Further, as well as God the Son, God the Father and God the Holy Spirit are also worthy of prayer, veneration and for mediation, this also eliminates the need for Saints in this process. 

My examples from Hebrews and New Testament Greek


Cited 

Strong's Concordance

'mesités: an arbitrator, a mediator 

Original Word: μεσίτης, ου, ὁ 
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine Transliteration: mesités 
Phonetic Spelling: (mes-ee'-tace) 
Definition: an arbitrator, a mediator 
Usage: (a) a mediator, intermediary, (b) a go-between, arbiter, agent of something good.' 

Cited 

Englishman's Concordance

My Hebrews references

'Hebrews 9:15 (Noun, nominative, masculine, singular)
GRK: διαθήκης καινῆς μεσίτης ἐστίν ὅπως 
NAS: reason He is the mediator of a new 
KJV: he is the mediator of the new 
INT: of a covenant new mediator he is so that 

Hebrews 12:24 (Noun, dative, masculine, singular)
GRK: διαθήκης νέας μεσίτῃ Ἰησοῦ καὶ 
NAS: and to Jesus, the mediator of a new 
KJV: to Jesus the mediator of the new 
INT: of a covenant new mediator to Jesus and'

End citations

God the Holy Spirit also mediates in a sense...

New American Standard Bible (NASB) 

Romans 8:26-27

26 In the same way the Spirit also helps our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we should, but the Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words; 27 and He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the [a]saints according to the will of God. Footnotes: Romans 8:27 Or holy ones 

Within the Orthodox Study Bible, Bishop Kallistos Ware states (paraphrased) that the Christian Church is a scriptural church and that Orthodoxy believes this as firmly if not more firmly than the Protestantism. (i). Interesting how this text uses this quote from Bishop Ware to contrast Orthodoxy with Protestantism as opposed to the Roman Catholic Church. 

My non-exhaustive take?

In contrast to some on the more fundamentalist wing of evangelicalism, that would often reason that the Orthodox Church is false Christianity, I, within the Reformed tradition, deduce with my limited (and now increasing) understanding of Orthodoxy, that indeed even with the importance of tradition, that scripture is taken as key and central within the Orthodox, Christian faith. Theological issues, between biblical evangelical, evangelical/Reformed and Protestant and Orthodoxy often have much to do with different interpretations of biblical scripture. This leads some to believe that one side is trusting in the scripture, more than the other. I will admit the extreme liberal wing of Protestantism has in many cases abandoned scripture in context as the final authority in spiritual matters; this can often be a sell-out of the gospel for modern secular worldviews, social causes, political causes, and being politically correct. There are those that call themselves Christians, within Protestantism and all Christian movements, that love the world and the world system, and attempt to mould the biblical God into a false reality.

Parked for work in Vancouver in October 2018
Bible Intro (2018), Canadian Bible Society, Toronto. 

BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Oxford Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

ERICKSON, MILLARD (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House. 

GRENZ, STANLEY J., DAVID GURETZKI and CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press. 

GUNDRY, ROBERT (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Grand Rapids, Zondervan. 

HAMILTON, VICTOR P. (1988) Handbook on the Pentateuch, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

KLEIN, WILLIAM W., CRAIG, C. BLOMBERG, AND ROBERT L. HUBBARD, JR. (1993) Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, London, Word Publishing. 

LA SOR, WILLIAM SANFORD, DAVID ALLAN HUBBARD, AND FREDERIC WILLIAM BUSH. (1987) Old Testament Survey, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

SCHRECK, ALAN (1984) Catholic and Christian, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Servant Books.

STRONG, J. (1890)(1986) Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Burlington, Welch Publishing Company.

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy,Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

WHALE, J.S. (1958) Christian Doctrine, Glasgow, Fontana Books.


Thursday, December 25, 2025

Review of Reasons To Believe: On evolution (very non-exhaustive); Satire Und Theology Version

Review of Reasons To Believe: On evolution (very non-exhaustive)

Preface

Originally published on Blogger, 20210801, revised 20251225.

Photo

Cologne, Germany, July 2021, I love my Germany, Facebook

(I was at Cologne Cathedral when I was eight years old. Extremely impressive building) 

Reasons to Believe: Newsletter (2021),July/August Reasons to Believe, Covina, California.

On the back page (4), Hugh Ross writes a very short article entitled 'Did God create us or did we evolve from a common ancestor with the apes?'

Dr. Ross immediately states 'I believe God directly intervened to create the first humans. Specifically, I hold the position that all humanity descended from a single male (Adam) and single female (Eve) whom God specially created. The writer of Genesis 1 and 2 uses Hebrew verbs (bara, asa, yatsar) for the origin of Adam and Eve, words that colorfully portray that God directly and miraculously intervened to bring about the origin of Adam and Eve. Genesis 3: 20 states that Eve would become the mother of us all. Acts 17: 26 declares that from one man, God made every nation of people.' (4)

When Dr. Ross states 'colorfully portray', this in my view connects to the biblical, theological concept that Genesis 1-3 is not written as mythology, as in fictional mythology. According to most scholarship, including many biblical conservatives, Genesis 1-3 does contain poetry and some degrees of figurative literal language.

Thursday, December 12, 2013 Genesis (PhD Edit) 

William Sanford La Sor, David Allan Hubbard, and Fredric William Bush (1987) from what I deduced was a moderate conservative, evangelical position, reason the author of Genesis is writing as an artist and storyteller who uses literary device. La Sor, Hubbard, and Bush (1987: 72). They point out it is imperative to distinguish which literary device is being used within the text of Genesis. La Sor, Hubbard, and Bush (1987: 72). 

Further, from what Dr. Ross wrote, using the New American Standard Bible (NASB), Romans 5 clearly requires a literal Adam, or at least first man, that would most reasonably be known as Adam. Romans 5: 12, through one man (Adam implied) sin entered the world and death to all of humanity. Romans 5: 14, death reigned from Adam to Moses. There was a universal corruption of humanity, see also Romans 1-3. Jesus Christ, the God-man, in Romans 5: 15, through grace covers sin.

Clearly, a literal, non-fictional, Adam, although admittedly described in figurative literal terms in Genesis 1-3, is described in more plain literal terms in Romans 5. Jesus Christ in comparison is the new Adam, last Adam, or second Adam. The existence and fall of Adam (and Eve) is biblically (Genesis 1-3, Romans, implied in Hebrews 2, as examples), theologically connecting the Adam of non-fiction and religious history, to the non-fiction and religious history of the death and resurrection, the atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ for his people (Romans 9, Ephesians 1-2, as examples).

Dr. Ross opines that 'Humans are truly exceptional.' (4). One example he cites is that human beings alone can advance technologically. (5). In my view, human beings alone (of the physical beings on earth) can ponder on the spiritual realm, on God, angelic beings, and demonic beings. Dr. Ross reasons that God created a 'sequence of bipedal primate creatures before creating human beings.' (5). Bipedal, as in an animal that walks on two limbs or two feet.


Bibliography from that article

'Tattersall, Ian; Schwartz, Jeffery (2000). Extinct Humans. Boulder CO: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-3482-0. 

Larsen, Clark Spencer; Matter, Robert M; Gebo, Daniel L (1991). Human Origins: the fossil record. Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, IL. ISBN 978-0-88133-575-0. 

"Smithsonian Human Origins Program". Retrieved 2006-08-29. 

"Prominent Hominid Fossils". Retrieved 2006-08-31.'

Grine, F.E.; Jungers, W.L.; Schultz, J. (1996). "Phenetic Affinities Among Early Homo Crania from East and South Africa". Journal of Human Evolution. 30 (3): 189–225. Bibcode:1996JHumE..30..189G. doi:10.1006/jhev.1996.0019.

Cited

The following tables give an overview of notable finds of hominin fossils and remains relating to human evolution, beginning with the formation of the tribe Hominini (the divergence of the human and chimpanzee lineages) in the late Miocene, roughly 7 to 8 million years ago. 

Cited 

The early fossils shown are not considered direct ancestors to Homo sapiens but are closely related to direct ancestors and are therefore important to the study of the lineage. 

I am not a scientist, but I side more so with evolutionary views of Dr. Ross and Reasons to Believe, than Darwinian Evolution. I can accept that evolution exists, not Darwinian type evolution with a secular, naturalistic, worldview, which of course includes considerable philosophy of science. But as a philosopher of religion and theologian, 'not considered direct ancestors', 'but closely related to direct ancestors' allows for debate and interpretations. Are these fossils demonstrating the same species, or similar species in regards to DNA and ontology? These creatures exist within same and similar ecologies and environments.

These can be the earlier bipedal primates as Dr. Ross suggests.

The Oxford Dictionary of Science 

Cited 

Evolution 

The gradual process by which the present diversity of plant and animal life arise from the earliest and most primitive organisms...(304). This is believed to have taken place the last 3000 million years. (3 billion, my add). (304). 

Cited 

Most controversial, however, and still to be clarified, are the relationship and evolution of groups above the species level. (304). In other words, evolution from scientifically reasoned species to species.


Cited

Transitional forms

Fossils or organisms that show the intermediate states between an ancestral form and that of its descendants are referred to as transitional forms. There are numerous examples of transitional forms in the fossil record, providing an abundance of evidence for change over time. 

Cited 

Our understanding of the evolution of horse feet, so often depicted in textbooks, is derived from a scattered sampling of horse fossils within the multi-branched horse evolutionary tree. These fossil organisms represent branches on the tree and not a direct line of descent leading to modern horses. 

Similar. 

Not a direct line. All horses or horselike?


Edited from my first comment in 2013 on that article, in regards to Genesis 1-3...

Even in light of reasoning a significant degree of literal, fall, within the Genesis 1-3 event, I admit, while I was studying theology of 'the fall' for my PhD, I did not find any evidence or argument that was biblically based or related that had me reason that Adam and Eve were not literal in Scripture, as in  they were instead myth and fictional. The historical story does contain, it appears, figurative literal language as in, for example, the serpent 'on your belly shall you go' New American Standard Bible (NASB). Presumed to be Satan, and it is very doubtful, that as a fallen angel, and spirit, the entity crawls perpetually. Perhaps this is figurative language for being cast in the human realm and the physical universe in some sense. 

But issues like that would still would not make Genesis 1-3 myth. It is still religious history. I did have a Professor at Columbia Bible that speculated that God could have created human beings more than once, perhaps explaining how different human beings differ in ethnicity and skin colour; and therefore he speculated that different human falls may have occurred (not my own view). Also, Adam from Genesis, in Romans 5, ties directly into the gospel message, as mentioned. With increasing study especially the PhD, I was made more aware of the key issue of being very aware using bible tools, of the type of language being used in Genesis 1-3, whether poetry or prose.

BRUCE, F.F. (1987) Romans, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

COURSON, JON (2005) Application Commentary, Thomas Nelson, Nashville. 

CRANFIELD, C.E.B. (1992) Romans: A Shorter Commentary, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

DUNN, JAMES D.G. (1988) Romans, Dallas, Word Books. 

FOULKES, FRANCIS (1989) Ephesians, Grand Rapids, Inter-Varsity Press. 

HARPUR, GEORGE (1986) Ephesians in The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

HUGHES, PHILIP, EDGCUMBE (1990) A Commentary On The Epistle To The Hebrews, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

LA SOR, WILLIAM SANFORD, DAVID ALLAN HUBBARD, AND FREDERIC WILLIAM BUSH. (1987) Old Testament Survey, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1990) The Book of Revelation, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1995) The New American Commentary: Romans, Nashville, Broadman & Holman Publishers.

OXFORD DICTIONARY OF SCIENCE (2010) Oxford, Oxford University Press.