PhD: Twitter quote 18

PhD: Twitter quote 18

PhD version

Marcel Sarot (1997) comments that many feminist theologians see theodicy as dominated by white males, and these feminists reject notions of God’s omniscience, omnipotence, and perfect goodness. Sarot (1997: 29). 

GEBARA, IVONE (2002) Out of the Depths, Translated by Ann Patrick Ware, Minneapolis, Fortress Press.

SAROT, MARCEL (1997) ‘Evil, Tragedy and Feminist Theology: New Impulses for Theodicy’, in Theology Digest, Volume 44, Number 1, Spring, pp. 29-33. St. Louis, Missouri, Theology Digest.

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter

PhD Full Version PDF 

Friday, October 01, 2010: Feminism Theodicy? (PhD edit) 

Monday, April 03, 2017: Feminism & The Problem of Evil, Revisited

Twitter version

Marcel Sarot comments that many feminist theologians see theodicy as dominated by white males, and  reject notions of God’s omniscience, omnipotence, and perfect goodness.

Pixabay photo of Conway, Castle, Wales

PhD: Twitter quote 17

PhD: Twitter quote 17

Photo: Mountains, Wales, Pixabay

PhD version

The Eighteenth century was when Leibniz’ book Theodicy was published as was previously noted, and this era of history was when much of the modern debate concerning the problem of evil and theodicy began.

LEIBNIZ, G.W. (1710)(1998) Theodicy, Translated by E.M. Huggard Chicago, Open Court Classics.

Thursday, May 23, 2013: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (PhD Edit)

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter

PhD Full Version PDF 

Twitter version 

The Eighteenth century was when Leibniz’ book Theodicy was published and this era of history was when much of the modern debate concerning the problem of evil and theodicy began.

PhD: Twitter quote 16

PhD: Twitter quote 16

Photo: Cardiff, Wales, Pixabay

PhD version

Theistic and Christian theodicy are therefore largely a response to initial Seventeenth, and primarily Eighteenth century and forward, secular criticisms of the theology and philosophy of God within religion and Christianity. Hille (2004: 22). 

HILLE, ROLF (2004) ‘A Biblical-Theological Response to the Problem of Theodicy in the Context of the Modern Criticism of Religion’, in Evangelical Review of Theology, Volume 28, Number 1, pp. 21-37. Carlisle, UK, Evangelical Review of Theology.

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter 

PhD Full Version PDF 

Twitter version 

Theistic and Christian theodicy are therefore largely a response to initial Seventeenth, and primarily Eighteenth century and forward, secular criticisms of the theology and philosophy of God within religion and Christianity.

PhD: Twitter quote 15

PhD: Twitter quote 15

Photo by my friend Ernest Hepnar

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter 

PhD Full Version PDF

PhD version

However, I can agree with Durston that even if there is no such thing as gratuitous evil, which is my position, large amounts of evil that appear gratuitous will exist. Durston (2000: 79). This would be evil that I would consider unexplainable, humanly speaking, but would not be gratuitous from God’s perspective. 

DURSTON, KIRK (2000) ‘The Consequential Complexity of History and Gratuitous Evil’, in Religious Studies, Volume 36, pp. 65-80. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Twitter version

Gratuitous evil would be unexplainable, humanly speaking, but would not be gratuitous from God’s perspective. 

Twitter version II 

Within my Reformed theology and connected theistic, philosophy of religion, gratuitous evil would be unexplainable, humanly speaking, but would not be gratuitous from God’s perspective.