Short Post On Ecards

Facebook

Rotten Ecards Card

I did not post this on Facebook because I would state it as is, or that I reason it is an exhaustive and extremely accurate philosophical statement.

No, I would not, but to some extent I agreed with what I viewed and view as the spirit of the message.

One should not preach to someone, without love or at the expense of love.

My Facebook comments edited:

Messages like this have limited context and are not exhaustive.

They (messages like this one) need to be read as such. It is not an all-encompassing philosophical text. It is just a point.

I reason the second (point) is more important than the first and that is what it likely meant. But it is exaggerated for point.

It is not worded how I would word it, but the spirit of it has merit.

It is like stating to me 'God does not care if you have a PhD, but that you love others'. God does care that I have a PhD, but loving others is more important. But such a statement could be stated to make a point.

In certain contexts, my PhD would not matter much, but loving others always would...etc..

I think with both examples (from the ecard and mine) it is always love others and do not use knowledge the wrong way...as in stating verses without love, PhD knowledge or not.

It is not stating to do not memorize. At least how I deduce and read it.

Knowledge is always a necessity in Christ and there are different levels and types, but must be in love.

It is just stated in a way with an agenda and not exhaustive, to make a point.

Funny idea, although of course unrealistic in this age. There is not exhaustive philosophical context and so this ecard can too be criticized.