Saturday, October 17, 2015

Thankfully Not What Work Is Like

Cascade Regional Park: Deroche BC















My two academic Blogger blogs, not the Facebook blog page, now feature new modern templates.

Stat Counter, now having very helpful technical support, informed me finally after many years of Elvis Presley dead silence that my classic templates were unable to work properly with Stat Counter as far as reading mobile pageviews.

I have therefore made attempts at customizing the modern templates which I hope are at least good and somewhat colour wise like previous classic templates, which I did not think were visually outdated at least.

I spent several years with HTML code developing those sites with classic templates into a look I really preferred and in reality they are not much different than the present custom templates. The previous templates were custom as well, just now outdated.

Well, I actually hope the new custom templates are excellent, but I am male and happen to like solid and dark colours; therefore my templates will not be everyone's cup of tea...



Thankfully Not What Work Is Like

I presently work in corporate security for a multi-trillion dollar asset corporation and so far the worst thing I have had to do is yell at some man for urinating near the corporate sign.

And of course stay away from the teeth of the K-9 unit with an attitude.

Quite a funny video in places. I do not know if they are all non-fictional. I sense some theatre...

Facebook

























I never attempt to be offensive on my blogs, but I think there is some truth in the above Dos Equis parody. Those who have read through the blog comments section, yes, few people, will realize that I have shared a like philosophy.

By the way, I think Dos Equis beer is very good, but as I drink little, I have not had one in several years.

Internet trolls are abusive.

Internet trolls intentionally cause negative environment.

Therefore, internet trolls can be reasonably blocked or deleted.

---

Worldview, theology, philosophy, cultural and social issues can be discussed intellectually.

Worldview, theology, philosophy, cultural and social issues can be discussed academically.

Worldview, theology, philosophy, cultural and social issues can be discussed objectively.

Worldview, theology, philosophy, cultural and social issues can be discussed in non-personal terms.

Therefore, a block or deletion is not reasonable.

Further

I am not stating one should not share Christian faith as well as philosophy, but I am stating that it can be discussed objectively as opposed to subjectively as in person versus person.

Personal issues could also be discussed without becoming a person versus person debate.

A block or deletion shows weakness by the blocking or deleting side.

Is the blocking or deleting side afraid the other side may be right on some points?

Is the blocking or deleting side afraid that the other side may provide points that may influence one to have to consider changing their views?

Trillion dollar points to consider...