Friday, June 18, 2010

A friend gave me a Paranormal Encyclopedia


I live here and my friend Walter Thomas Franklin lives that way...

As noted on my other blog, thekingpin68, I am recovering from a vitrectomy, and have a temporary gas bubble in my eye. So my vision is 'abstruckted' obstructed.

The other day, my good friend and frequent blog commenter, Bobby Buff/Walter Thomas Franklin and various other aliases, gave me a gift, a castoff book given to him that he wanted to get rid of. However it may suit our purposes.


What an attractive cover. I could take a picture of myself with black eye presently, with my Blackberry and still be prettier than Wolfgang in the bottom right corner. And I have the alien freak beat, no problem.

MATTHEWS, RUPERT (ed.) PAUL ROLAND, KAREN FARRINGTON, LUCY DONCASTER, ANDREW HOLLAND, (2009) The Encyclopedia of the Paranormal, London, Arcturus.

Blackburn states that paranormal is phenomena supposedly beyond the powers of the mind. These phenomena are attempted to be understood scientifically. Blackburn (1996: 277).

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

So, I suppose I can discuss a section, at least, of this book and see what the public response is.

Ouija Boards

The volume suggests the word ouija comes from a combination of French and German words for yes. (p. 26). The board was produced as a parlour game in 1898 by the Field brothers of Baltimore. (p. 26). Today there are various versions of the game.


U.S. Patent D056449 (PDF). Design patent for toys (D21/813) which was filed May 26, 1920. Issued Oct 26, 1920. Patentee was Clifford H. McGlasson.
From: New World Encylopedia

The board has numbers, the letters of the alphabet and some 'mystical symbols' to make it look scary. (p. 27). Participants place a finger on the pointer/planchette which moves on casters. (p. 27). It is supposedly moved by spirits. The participant asks a question and the answer is spelled out as the planchette moves on the board.

The ouija is seen as a channel for a person that is not a medium, in order for that person to make contact with the spirit world. This is seen as the case whether a spirit or person is actually primarily moving the pointer. (p. 27).

Now, quite obviously, this game could be used by someone who psychologically makes the board state what is desired. The game could also be used in order for a participant to deceive observers.

The occult as with religion can be used for psychological purposes which leads to unintended deception. The occult as with religion can also be used for the purposes of intended deception.

I would not assume that every use of this game/tool will lead to a paranormal experience. I would not assume that it would be a regular occurrence with the game. However, I am not an expert on the topic.

The text states that detractors suggest that supposed spirit messages could come from a participants unconscious. (p. 27).

Demonic Forces

The book states there have been an alarming number of violent attacks and teenage suicides involving certain disturbed impressionable persons who claim to have been following the instructions of demonic forces contacted via a ouija board. (p. 29).

The game can become dangerously addictive and a problem for those that are psychologically disturbed. (p. 29).

The book postulates the board may not be itself 'intrinsically bad' but should not be used by the irresponsible and immature that cannot handle what they receive. (p. 29).

I doubt deceased persons are taking part with the ouija board as deceased persons/spirits are disembodied by nature and should not be a threat to living persons.

I have doubts that disembodied spirits would even have the natural control or ability to respond to such a game. God had Samuel respond to a medium (1 Samuel 28), but that was a rare case.

So, the demonic forces suggestion is a reasonable one made by the text.

Further:

Demonic beings are opposed to God and are very evil.

They can Biblically harass all persons and in some cases heavily influence persons which is seen in the Hebrew Bible and New Testament.

Therefore, no person is responsible or mature enough to reasonably be dabbling with any kind of ouija board.

Further:

I am not some 'crazed fundamentalist' that the mainstream media can reasonably mock, but I reason that if a person is interested in spiritual life, the paranormal, and the supernatural, it is far more reasonable to have dealings with the infinite triune God of Scripture than his finite evil fallen demonic creations which serve his purposes, even as they oppose him (Job).

Guru Chucky lives that way...


Guru Chucky arrives this evening. The glowing guru.

36 comments:

  1. Are glowing eyes considered paranormal activity?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Are glowing eyes considered paranormal activity?

    LOL, yeah, I was going to say that the photo of "Guru Chucky" looks a bit paranormal. But not as bad as this Chucky, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Should Obama control the internet?

    It's absurd this is even being suggested by members of congress.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am one of the 3 great gurus from the blessed land of Maple Ridge.
    Our religions are: Chuckism, Bobism (led by WTF?), and of course Kingpism.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 'chucky said...
    Are glowing eyes considered paranormal activity?'

    Parabnormal guru glow?

    ReplyDelete
  6. 'Are glowing eyes considered paranormal activity?

    LOL, yeah, I was going to say that the photo of "Guru Chucky" looks a bit paranormal. But not as bad as this Chucky, of course.'

    Yes, this Chucky is a Mennonite and non-resistant.

    Cheers.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 'chucky said...
    Should Obama control the internet?

    It's absurd this is even being suggested by members of congress.'

    As I stated in our conversation, this seems primarily political.

    I deduce that those on the internet that are breaking the law and are potential major threats can be significantly investigated without new laws.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 'I am one of the 3 great gurus from the blessed land of Maple Ridge.
    Our religions are: Chuckism, Bobism (led by WTF?), and of course Kingpism.'

    Chuckism: The life of the celibate that seeks to nurse Mother until she dies or goes completely nuts.

    Bobbism: The life of Walter Thomas Franklin and his hum and haw approach to coming over. 'Maybe I will, maybe I won't (especially now that cougar is around).'

    Kingpism: The life of heavy academic study for both work and hobby with no pay and only the wonderful admiration of his blog readers.

    The ones that don't delete him, block him or state nasty (untrue) things about him, that is.

    PEACE.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What great pals you have, Here buddy, let me give you a gift. It's a book I dont want or like. LOL.

    Chuckism: The life of the celibate that seeks to nurse Mother until she dies or goes completely nuts.

    Question? How can you be celibate and yet nurse your mother?

    Then if by mother you mean your real mom, thats nasty, if you mean mother in the sense of wife or girlfriend, then how can you do that yet remain celibate?

    Since I'm married and will not comment as to if I "nurse mommy" or not, I guess I cannot be a part of the life of Chuckism. LOL. Rick b

    ReplyDelete
  10. 'What great pals you have, Here buddy, let me give you a gift. It's a book I dont want or like. LOL.'

    Yes, Walter works that way....golly.

    As for the other friend:

    Well, he is called Pope, Saint, Sir, and Cardinal Chucklins for very good reasons.

    As he states, he minds the fort. And plays in it also.

    He takes care of his senior citizen Mother as required.

    If he has to break a female heart, he does it like a true guy...a computer guy.

    Chuckism? Yea I would not be interested in chucking it out either, Rick.

    Thanks, Rick.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There was a horror movie that came out in 2007, called "Paranormal Activity." I did not see it, but I did look up some quotes from the movie, just to have some material to use as a comment. Here are a few:

    Katie: You promised me - don't look at me like that! - you promised me you weren't going to mess with that stuff.
    Micah: No. I promised you I wasn't going to buy a Ouija board. I didn't buy a Ouija board. I borrowed a Ouija board.

    Micah: [while waiting on a very tardy psychic] So you'd think a psychic would, uh, be on time. You know, like he could foretell if the traffic was going to be bad?

    Micah: I understand where you're coming from- just remember too, that you didn't exactly warn me about this kind of stuff before we moved in together, so I think I have a little bit of say in what we do.
    Katie: I get that, but honestly what was I supposed to say? On our first date, 'Hey, I think there's a demon that I think has been following me.'
    Micah: No, but maybe on our fifteenth date, or our thirtieth date, or when we decided to live together... that might've been a good thing to bring up.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 'Katie: I get that, but honestly what was I supposed to say? On our first date, 'Hey, I think there's a demon that I think has been following me.''

    Should she call Ernest Angley?

    Cheers.:)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Maybe Guru Chucky's eyes glow as
    he's RICH! heh.



    -=poor, boring zombie=-

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes, share your wealth $aint Chucklin$.

    We should be in South Africa right now watching live matches, thanks to Chuck.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 'The smoking baby, that is really sad.'

    Yes.

    Pathetic parenting, and the story becomes comedy material for David Letterman.

    Cheers.

    ReplyDelete
  16. What a shame for those individuals responsible in giving cigs to that child!
    -Whacky Tobacky-

    ReplyDelete
  17. What a nice area around your neighborhood, wouldn't you like to be my neighbor (sing last line like Mr. Rogers)
    -Walky Talky-

    ReplyDelete
  18. Grown ups need to set examples for the younger generation Mr. French Soccer Coach, Cmon, its only a game!
    -Socc it Up-

    ReplyDelete
  19. 'What a shame for those individuals responsible in giving cigs to that child!
    -Whacky Tobacky-'

    Child services in Indonesia?

    Hmm, does not give me much confidence.

    ReplyDelete
  20. 'What a nice area around your neighborhood, wouldn't you like to be my neighbor (sing last line like Mr. Rogers)
    -Walky Talky-'

    You know what? You are the closest thing (person) I know to Mr. Rogers.

    ReplyDelete
  21. 'Grown ups need to set examples for the younger generation Mr. French Soccer Coach, Cmon, its only a game!
    -Socc it Up-'

    Yes, grown ups, not grow-ops.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  22. According to the Huffington Post:

    "French coach Raymond Domenech had anything but a pleasant World Cup. He was criticized by soccer legend Zinedine Zidane early on. He argued with his star striker during a crushing loss to Mexico, and the fiery coach sent his adversary home following the dispute.

    Things only got worse from there. The France World Cup team refused to practice in protest of their teammate's dismissal, and the squad ultimately lost their final match to an underwhelming South African team.

    How did Domenech handle the news? By refusing to shake his opposing coach's hand."

    According to Japan Today:

    "Parreira said an assistant coach for France later told him that Domenech was angry because the Brazilian had said France didn’t deserve to be at the World Cup.

    Press reports from December quote Parreira as saying France wouldn’t have qualified if not for Thierry Henry’s “shameful” handball that helped France beat Ireland in a playoff in November.

    A stunned Parreira was adamant this was not true.

    “He is no longer going to be the French coach, and as a matter of practice, I wanted to greet him,” Parreira said. “He said that I had offended the French team, and I for the life of me can’t believe what it is that I have said.”

    ReplyDelete
  23. Thanks, Jeff. Well-done.

    In the second match, which was a draw, France needed a goal.

    Anelka is a star striker with France and Chelsea (English champions).

    Anelka is probably as good as any French striker.

    I think the coach made a mistake taking him out of the game.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I like the narration that you have added on a trial basis, whats next?
    -Curious George-

    ReplyDelete
  25. Finally, Yoko Ono and Linda McCartney together!

    ReplyDelete
  26. 'I like the narration that you have added on a trial basis, whats next?
    -Curious George-'

    It is pretty good, but the demo could only be seen by us tonight.

    The demo is not public, sadly.

    livefaceonweb.com

    ReplyDelete
  27. 'Finally, Yoko Ono and Linda McCartney together!'

    Torture?

    Psychological warfare?

    ReplyDelete
  28. love the soccer/football clips!

    sweet theatrics by players and coaches alike.


    Wayne Rooney

    ReplyDelete
  29. Thanks.

    As I told you, Chucklins and Walter last night/this morning, that battle in the net was the best part of the match for me.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Well, the battle in the net was more entertaining than the battle in front of it.


    -=whyte zombee=-

    ReplyDelete
  31. 'Well, the battle in the net was more entertaining than the battle in front of it.


    -=whyte zombee=-'

    Football shenanigans.

    Love it.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Brilliant blog..it has worth reading, understanding and knowledge..I really appreciate you dear Russ for sharing this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Thanks, Paul. I try. The Lord and others have assisted me.

    Blessings to you and family!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Great article! As one that has seen many paranormal activities-demons, UFO'S ETC, I'm thankful that by the power of the blood of the Lamb, unclean spirits have to flee. In Jesus name. It's too sad that much of the body of Christ is too ill equipped to specifically address this realm with POWER and confidence. May the Holy Spirit give us hearts of passion and humility to break the chains of darkness off of the lives of those around us.

    ReplyDelete