Sunday, November 16, 2014

Chaldeans

Prague-Facebook-Travel+Leisure
























Wales Bangor MPhil 2003

Note, the work below was from my MPhil research. I became more knowledgeable in regard to compatibilism completing the PhD and better understood philosophically concepts in regard to God determining and causing.

One can notice on the blog version I have some post PhD revisions in red placed in my MPhil. 

A friend asked by email if in my problem of evil research I had done any work on the Chaldeans and Habakkuk 1.

Habakkuk 1:6

New American Standard Bible (NASB) 6 “For behold, I am raising up the Chaldeans, That [a]fierce and impetuous people Who march [b]throughout the earth To [c]seize dwelling places which are not theirs.

Footnotes: Habakkuk 1:6 Lit bitter Habakkuk 1:6 Lit the breadth of Habakkuk 1:6 Lit take possession of New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation

MPhil work in regard to Chaldeans and Job

‘Calvin also discussed in The Institutes the case of the Chaldeans attacking Job, that God, Satanic beings and human beings can all participate in the same evil acts: How can we attribute the same work to God, to Satan, and to man, without either excusing Satan by the interference of God, or making God the author of the crime? This is easily done, if we look first to the end, and then to the mode of acting. The Lord designs to exercise the patience of his servant by adversity; Satan’s plan is to drive him to despair; while the Chaldeans are bent on making unlawful gain by plunder. Such diversity of purpose makes a wide distinction in the act. . . . We thus see that there is no inconsistency in attributing the same act to God, to Satan, and to man, while, from the difference in the end and mode of action, the spotless righteousness of God shines forth at the same time that the iniquity of Satan and of man is manifested in all its deformity. Calvin, (1539)(1998) Book II, Chapter 4, Section 2.

My idea is that the term allowing evil is too weak with regard to God’s ultimate sovereignty in his creation. God wills evil for the greater good and, as Calvin noted, God’s motive is perfectly good, not sinful and contradictory to his nature, while his fallen creation can still choose to disobey him freely. Their nature is fallen and they cannot do good work without the help of God. Left to their own means, their evil nature leads to evil actions. Blocher stated: "One may as well take one’s position from the stern candour of Scripture: if evil occurs under the rule of God, then his will is involved." Blocher (1994: 95-96).

BLOCHER, HENRI. (1994) Evil and the Cross, Translated by David G. Preston, Leicester, InterVarsity Press.

CALVIN, JOHN (1539)(1998) The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book II, Grand Rapids, Wheaton College. http://www.smartlink.net/~douglas/calvin/

CALVIN, JOHN (1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

Another lovely photo of Bulgarian Princess Jr. after church, as per request of Bulgarian Princess Sr. Speaking of which, in the parking lot, Sr. once again being a lovely Eastern European diva shared yet another story in front of husband Deaaan of how some 'older guy' Dean's and my age wanted to dance with her the other night. He also complemented her on her lovely black boots (which can be used for booting as well as walking, I suppose). She of course stated she was married etc.. but her Slavic charms are of course far too great for many, many mortal Canadian men. Dean figures she gathered attention because she was younger and I very much agree but always think the 'Eastern European diva' factor has to be factored in, that being Canadian so called 'older guy' thinks he hears Eastern European accent and sees younger woman and reasons I have a valid philosophical, romantic opportunity here.;)



21 comments:

  1. I agree with most of the preaching @ church. But theologically having studied theodicy and problem for 12 years with MTS, and especially, MPhil-PhD; I have some issues...

    I mentioned some of this on a brief on idolatry post on my main blog:

    Clearly it is intellectually and theologically possible to desire things in Christ through the Holy Spirit and still not be happy.

    And I would add, depressed, without God-given contentment.

    It is possible not to be as right as one could be, but where God wants one to be.

    Personally, I do not reason that happiness should be our goal in such a fallen realm, rather it should be peace, joy and fulfilment in Christ even while there are problems of evil and suffering.

    I do think that lack of misery should be a goal, that is lack of extreme suffering for prolonged periods.

    There are many things that could make a sincere Christian unhappy apart from being in a state of idolatry.

    These include, non-exhaustively, lack of air, water, starvation, physical injury such as a serious wound needing treatment, physical assault, rape, loneliness, poverty, amputation, blindness, deafness, physical deformity and social ramifications, diseases such as cancer, ALS, apparent lack of salvation for friends and family, death of friend or family member and so on.

    To simply state that when Christians are suffering with unanswered prayer, that these are 'felt needs' as one pastor stated at another church, when God does not grant them, does not seem accurate.

    It is also faulty to simply state to pray, study and fellowship more, although vital.

    That type of theology, when not reasonably balanced, also plays philosophically, in my humble opinion, into the Christian critic's hands because a realistic apologetic of reason is not being used.

    There are true needs that in this realm of problems of evil and suffering are not always met by God.

    I realize that this is very difficult for some evangelicals to accept, but examine the evidence.

    As God meets the needs of his saints in order to accomplish his will.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1 John 5:14-15 English Standard Version (ESV)

    '14 And this is the confidence that we have toward him, that if we ask anything according to his will he hears us. 15 And if we know that he hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have the requests that we have asked of him.'

    This is my view is not stating that God will meet all needs, 'felt needs' or actual needs such as losing a leg due to amputation and needing a new one, in this realm.

    Are we as an apologetic going to seriously state to the amputee that you really do not need that leg, or God would give it to you?

    Or rather is the situation more accurately a reflection of God's sovereign will.

    Suffering included.

    R.W. Orr in regard to I John, notes that persons praying into the will of God are brought into the 'fellowship of divine life'. Orr (1986: 1584).

    I do not find the idea from 1 John or the New Testament that God meets all of our needs in Christ in this realm, but rather his needs for us are met in prayer as in his purposes for persons.

    Not ontological divine needs of God. There are none.

    Therefore, this allows for the possibility for suffering, lack of fulfilment, misery and depression to some extent for a person that has the Holy Spirit and the atoning and resurrection work of Christ applied to them by grace through faith alone, leading to good works.

    This is not idolatry. This is not idolatry to desire for things to be better, to be fixed.

    Although I can admit that where there is natural good desires, related evil desires can also exist which would be idolatry. Therefore idolatry remains a very significant issue.

    I therefore, have a strong technical disagreement with the 'all we need is Jesus or God theology'.

    Rather, in light of Biblical truth and the Gospel and the problem of evil, we need all things in Christ, in the trinue God.

    Otherwise things are of idolatry and not of everlasting life.

    All we need is Jesus is again not sufficient theology. Rather it should be stated we need all things in Christ and can suffer in Christ.

    BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    CRAIGIE, P.C. (1996) 'Idolatry', in Walter A. Elwell (ed.), Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Books.

    ORR, R.W. (1986) I John, in F.F. Bruce (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reilly went to trial for armed robbery. The jury foreman came out and announced, "Not guilty."
    "That's grand!" shouted Reilly. "Does that mean I can keep the money?"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Irish lass customer: "Could I be trying on that dress in the window?"
    Shopkeeper: "I'd prefer that you use the dressing room."

    ReplyDelete
  5. Move Your Bowels With Ease and Regularity - No Side Effects

    ReplyDelete
  6. How to use Himalayan "love tar"

    ReplyDelete
  7. $16 -- Handel’s 'Messiah,' Half Off 'Hallelujah'

    ReplyDelete
  8. Many people complain about the state of the world today, but on some things it may be worse, but if you look at some of the facts and figures, you may end up deducing that the state of humanity has never been better. We fight less wars, commit less crimes, live longer and are more educated than ever before.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Drinking with an Alberta girl
    A Mexican, an Arab, and an Alberta girl are in the
    same bar.


    When the Mexican finishes his beer, he throws his glass in the
    air, pulls out his pistol, and shoots the glass to pieces. He says, 'In Mexico , our glasses are so cheap we don't need to drink with the same one twice.'


    The Arab, obviously impressed by this, drinks his beer, throws it into the air, pulls out his AK-47, and shoots the glass to pieces. He says, 'In the Arab World,
    we have so much sand to make glasses that we don't need to drink with the same one twice either.'


    The Alberta girl, cool as a cucumber, picks up her beer, downs it in one gulp, throws the glass into the air, whips out her 45, and shoots the Mexican and the Arab.




    Catching her glass, setting it on the bar, and calling for a refill, she says,
    'In Canada
    we have so many illegal aliens that we don't have to drink with the same
    ones twice.'



    'God Bless
    Canada! '

    You gotta love
    those Alberta gals!!!

    ReplyDelete


  10. Number 9 - Death is the number 1 killer in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Number 8 - Life is sexually transmitted.

    ReplyDelete


  12. Number 7 - Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Number 6 - Men have two emotions: hungry and horny, and they can't tell them apart. If you see a gleam in his eyes, make him a sandwich.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Number 5 - Give a person a fish and you feed them for a day. Teach a person to fish the Internet and they won't bother you for weeks, months... maybe years.

    ReplyDelete


  15. Number 4 - Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in the hospital, dying of nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Number 3 - All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Number 2 - In the 60's, people took acid to make the world weird. Now the world is weird, and people take Prozac to make it normal.

    ReplyDelete


  18. Number 1 - Life is like a jar of jalapeno peppers. What you do today might burn your ass tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete


  19. Don't worry about 'Old Age'...it doesn't last that long.

    ReplyDelete