Sunday, January 09, 2022

Short Bullets: I begrudgingly accepted my friend's request to WhatsApp, then he asked me to review Calvinism and Girls


Preface

• A good friend of mine recently invited me to WhatsApp. 

• Months ago, I had been invited to WhatsApp, via church home group, and had declined. 

• I have so many apps going on already. 

• But my friend wanted to get off Facebook Messenger, so I begrudgingly joined WhatsApp for his sake.

• But, he is correct, it might have its benefits for my sake.

• He soon sent me the above video to review, so here goes.. 

• As I have noted online previously, I do not consider myself a Calvinist, but a Reformed theologian, with some Anabaptist leanings, and a theistic, philosopher of religion. 

• Even so, Calvinists are Reformed.

• I am not familiar with Doug Wilson, other than the one I saw play for the Chicago Blackhawks.


• The Doug Wilson in the video is a pastor, theologian and philosopher, I take it, cited 'Wilson earned a BA in classical studies and a BA and an MA in philosophy from the University of Idaho.'


The Video 

• Cited: 'December 29, 2021'- 'In this episode of Blog & Mablog, Pastor Doug Wilson continues his series of letters to a fictional nephew about the relationship between the sexes, this time discussing Calvinism and girls. '

• Not sure why they are not called women. 

• I call female toddlers and babies, girls, but that is just me...(maybe Doug and I, as theologians and philosophers, have an age gap)

Roughly 30 second mark forward: SMV=Sexual Market Value. 

• SMV and like terms are used within Red Pill videos.

• I do not hold to Red Pill as a life philosophy, it is not a Christian worldview.

• However, at points, certain Red Pills teachers, and those that teach psychology in agreement with Red Pill, do accurately review secular perspectives on dating in the modern Western reality.

• I do not like market value dating concepts, philosophically, morally and ethically, but I have to admit there is such a thing as SMV thinking out there.

• I have studied psychology and dating online for about 15 years. 

• My good friend Miss CIA, has told me it is like I have a PhD is Psychology. 

• As a a philosopher (and theologian), I have rare relatable options with modern women, very few evangelical/Reformed intellectuals are available that would interest me.

• So, I have applied my God-given intellect to this issue, rather than depending on dating trial and error.

• Or to be blunt, rather than asking trial and error.

• The truth is that prayer, and God's grace through faith (Ephesians 1-2) are key for me.

Roughly 50 second mark forward: I am both transactional and relational on the subject of romantic relationships.

• I support mutual, spiritual, intellectual, romantic, attraction in Christ (1 Corinthians 7, to overcome the burn of lust, 2 Corinthians 6, to be in unity with someone not unequally yoked)

Roughly the 1:00 minute mark forward: I do not ask someone out on a date. I do not chase after anyone.

 I actually favour biblical courtship. 

 But I may be considering a few young (youthful) women from time to time.

 An issue I have is I have been accused of being too serious (especially by my Japanese friend Hirtotake! in the past), and a church greeter recently said I looked morose entering the church. 

• So, when I am friendly with a woman I might like, I deduce there is often the assumption I want to date her.

• Hmm, maybe court, but perhaps I am chatting with a few other females as well.

• Simply 'liking' someone does not equate to mutual, spiritual, intellectual, romantic, connection.

• I am not the simplistic man many in Hollywood like to portray men as today.

• For example, maybe a woman I like thinks I am ugly. 

• My actor friend Phil, that worked with Stephen Seagal called me a bada** with the martial arts, etcetera.

• I am not for everyone.

• As a philosopher, I prayerfully analyze someone and hopefully talk with her (I am working on improving in that area).

• I am thinking and praying, who likes me?, who likes me the most?

Roughly 1:17 mark forward: Zero chance I am asking four young ladies/women out on a date, no worries, Doug.

 • From a secular perspective, the psychological dangers and pressures of asking out a woman on a date, when there is any doubts on the issue...

Roughly 3: 30 mark forward: Lol,  I agree with Red Pill, here in general, but not absolute terms. Sweet versus creepy often has to do with how attractive the male is perceived by the female.

• A problem I have with seeking 'the one' is attempting to meticulously manage one's own romantic life.

• If one is ever married, when one is married, and with whom, is in reality under the meticulous, providential control of God.

• Within Reformed theology, the Lord might allow as in divine, permissible will, a person to control his/her romantic life. (I think this often happens, to be blunt)

• Roughly 6:00 forward: I significantly agree with Doug Wilson (paraphrased), I would state that we need to primarily, live the will of God and secondarily, know the will of God.

• This requires being prayerfully open-minded and biblically minded, I suppose.

• But, knowing as in attempting to meticulously control any aspect of life is not biblical.

• Love is the key, and the truth, in Jesus Christ.

Fini

No comments:

Post a Comment