James 3:8 But no one can tame the tongue; it is a restless evil and full of deadly poison. NASB.
From:
http://www.soberrecovery.com/forums/recovery-follies/4616-
things-not-say-cop-when-you-re-pulled-over.html
1. Things not to say to a cop when you're pulled over...
I only had one officer Mr. Keg..
Back off Barney, I've got a piece.
I know I was weaving, but I can't find the Honeycomb Hideout!
On the way to the station let's get a twelve pack.
Come on write the ticket, the bars close in 20 minutes!
I'm surprised you stopped me, Dunkin Donuts has a 3 for 1 special!
Yeah you can see my license and registration, officer, but could you hold my beer for a minute?
Hey, you must've been doing' about 125mph (200km/h) to keep up with me!
Good job! Sorry, Officer, I didn't realize my radar detector wasn't plugged in.
I thought you had to be in relatively good physical condition to be a Police Officer.
I was trying to keep up with traffic. Yes, I know there are no cars around, that's how far I am behind the other cars.
You're NOT gonna check the trunk, are you?
Lets do it different this time...
I bet I could grab that gun before you finish writing my ticket.
Hey is that a 9 mm? That's nothing compared to this .44 magnum.
Is it true that people become policemen because they are too dumb to work at McDonalds?
Aren't you one of the Village People?
2. In the clip below, Manchester United is in the process of defeating Arsenal 4-0 in a F.A. Cup match. The United player decides to put on a dribbling show against Arsenal that was not appreciated by all. As I was falling asleep a few nights ago, I overheard a shouting match between two commentators on Talksport via the web concerning whether the display was acceptable sportsmanship. On Wade's Rantings awhile back I stated I did not like sore winners, but to be honest, the dribbling display, the game broadcasting comments, the Arsenal reactions, and especially the two commenters arguing and shouting on Talksport has put a grin on my face.
Please place your opinions in comments. Was Nani being a sore winner, or likely just having a bit of fun? I favour the second option. Should The Council of Nani be called to discuss his actions?
http://wadesrantings.blogspot.com/2008/02/good-eli-bad-
belichick-ugly-petty.html
Saturday, 16 February 2008
http://www2.talksport.net/premiership/
3. Occasionally on this blog I like to provide listed historical information. I am not an expert on the Ecumenical Councils, but inevitably in theology and apologetics discussions the subject of Councils comes up. I supply a list from what I have found to be a helpful and good source over the years, New Advent which is coming from a Roman Catholic perspective. The Councils therefore are noted from this historical perspective. I am of course a Presbyterian and not a Roman Catholic.
http://www.newadvent.org/library/almanac_14388a.htm
The 21 Ecumenical Councils
I. FIRST COUNCIL OF NICAEA
Year: 325
Summary: The Council of Nicaea lasted two months and twelve days. Three hundred and eighteen bishops were present. Hosius, Bishop of Cordova, assisted as legate of Pope Sylvester. The Emperor Constantine was also present. To this council we owe the Nicene Creed, defining against Arius the true Divinity of the Son of God (homoousios), and the fixing of the date for keeping Easter (against the Quartodecimans).
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/11044a.htm
II. FIRST COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE
Year: 381
Summary: The First General Council of Constantinople, under Pope Damasus and the Emperor Theodosius I, was attended by 150 bishops. It was directed against the followers of Macedonius, who impugned the Divinity of the Holy Ghost. To the above-mentioned Nicene Creed it added the clauses referring to the Holy Ghost (qui simul adoratur) and all that follows to the end.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/04308a.htm
III. COUNCIL OF EPHESUS
Year: 431
Summary: The Council of Ephesus, of more than 200 bishops, presided over by St. Cyril of Alexandria representing Pope Celestine I, defined the true personal unity of Christ, declared Mary the Mother of God (theotokos) against Nestorius, Bishop of Constantinople, and renewed the condemnation of Pelagius.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/05491a.htm
IV. COUNCIL OF CHALCEDON
Year: 451
Summary: The Council of Chalcedon -- 150 bishops under Pope Leo the Great and the Emperor Marcian -- defined the two natures (Divine and human) in Christ against Eutyches, who was excommunicated.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/03555a.htm
V. SECOND COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE
Year: 553
Summary: The Second General Council of Constantinople, of 165 bishops under Pope Vigilius and Emperor Justinian I, condemned the errors of Origen and certain writings (The Three Chapters) of Theodoret, of Theodore, Bishop of Mopsuestia and of Ibas, Bishop of Edessa; it further confirmed the first four general councils, especially that of Chalcedon whose authority was contested by some heretics.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/04308b.htm
VI. THIRD COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE
Years: 680-681
Summary: The Third General Council of Constantinople, under Pope Agatho and the Emperor Constantine Pogonatus, was attended by the Patriarchs of Constantinople and of Antioch, 174 bishops, and the emperor. It put an end to Monothelitism by defining two wills in Christ, the Divine and the human, as two distinct principles of operation. It anathematized Sergius, Pyrrhus, Paul, Macarius, and all their followers.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/04310a.htm
VII. SECOND COUNCIL OF NICAEA
Year: 787
Summary: The Second Council of Nicaea was convoked by Emperor Constantine VI and his mother Irene, under Pope Adrian I, and was presided over by the legates of Pope Adrian; it regulated the veneration of holy images. Between 300 and 367 bishops assisted.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/11045a.htm
VIII. FOURTH COUNCIL OF CONSTANTINOPLE
Year: 869
Summary: The Fourth General Council of Constantinople, under Pope Adrian II and Emperor Basil numbering 102 bishops, 3 papal legates, and 4 patriarchs, consigned to the flames the Acts of an irregular council (conciliabulum) brought together by Photius against Pope Nicholas and Ignatius the legitimate Patriarch of Constantinople; it condemned Photius who had unlawfully seized the patriarchal dignity. The Photian Schism, however, triumphed in the Greek Church, and no other general council took place in the East.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/04310b.htm
IX. FIRST LATERAN COUNCIL
Year: 1123
Summary: The First Lateran Council, the first held at Rome, met under Pope Callistus II. About 900 bishops and abbots assisted. It abolished the right claimed by lay princes, of investiture with ring and crosier to ecclesiastical benefices and dealt with church discipline and the recovery of the Holy Land from the infidels.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/09016b.htm
X. SECOND LATERAN COUNCIL
Year: 1139
Summary: The Second Lateran Council was held at Rome under Pope Innocent II, with an attendance of about 1000 prelates and the Emperor Conrad. Its object was to put an end to the errors of Arnold of Brescia.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/09017a.htm
XI. THIRD LATERAN COUNCIL
Year: 1179
Summary: The Third Lateran Council took place under Pope Alexander III, Frederick I being emperor. There were 302 bishops present. It condemned the Albigenses and Waldenses and issued numerous decrees for the reformation of morals.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/09017b.htm
XII. FOURTH LATERAN COUNCIL
Year: 1215
Summary: The Fourth Lateran Council was held under Innocent III. There were present the Patriarchs of Constantinople and Jerusalem, 71 archbishops, 412 bishops, and 800 abbots the Primate of the Maronites, and St. Dominic. It issued an enlarged creed (symbol) against the Albigenses (Firmiter credimus), condemned the Trinitarian errors of Abbot Joachim, and published 70 important reformatory decrees. This is the most important council of the Middle Ages, and it marks the culminating point of ecclesiastical life and papal power.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/09018a.htm
XIII. FIRST COUNCIL OF LYONS
Year: 1245
Summary: The First General Council of Lyons was presided over by Innocent IV; the Patriarchs of Constantinople, Antioch, and Aquileia (Venice), 140 bishops, Baldwin II, Emperor of the East, and St. Louis, King of France, assisted. It excommunicated and deposed Emperor Frederick II and directed a new crusade, under the command of St. Louis, against the Saracens and Mongols.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/09476b.htm
XIV. SECOND COUNCIL OF LYONS
Year: 1274
Summary: The Second General Council of Lyons was held by Pope Gregory X, the Patriarchs of Antioch and Constantinople, 15 cardinals, 500 bishops, and more than 1000 other dignitaries. It effected a temporary reunion of the Greek Church with Rome. The word filioque was added to the symbol of Constantinople and means were sought for recovering Palestine from the Turks. It also laid down the rules for papal elections.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/09476c.htm
XV. COUNCIL OF VIENNE
Years: 1311-1313
Summary: The Council of Vienne was held in that town in France by order of Clement V, the first of the Avignon popes. The Patriarchs of Antioch and Alexandria, 300 bishops (114 according to some authorities), and 3 kings -- Philip IV of France, Edward II of England, and James II of Aragon -- were present. The synod dealt with the crimes and errors imputed to the Knights Templars, the Fraticelli, the Beghards, and the Beguines, with projects of a new crusade, the reformation of the clergy, and the teaching of Oriental languages in the universities.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/15423a.htm
XVI. COUNCIL OF CONSTANCE
Years: 1414-1418
The Council of Constance was held during the great Schism of the West, with the object of ending the divisions in the Church. It became legitimate only when Gregory XI had formally convoked it. Owing to this circumstance it succeeded in putting an end to the schism by the election of Pope Martin V, which the Council of Pisa (1403) had failed to accomplish on account of its illegality. The rightful pope confirmed the former decrees of the synod against Wyclif and Hus. This council is thus ecumenical only in its last sessions (42-45 inclusive) and with respect to the decrees of earlier sessions approved by Martin V.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/04288a.htm
XVII. COUNCIL OF BASLE/FERRARA/FLORENCE
Years: 1431-1439
Summary: The Council of Basle met first in that town, Eugene IV being pope, and Sigismund Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. Its object was the religious pacification of Bohemia. Quarrels with the pope having arisen, the council was transferred first to Ferrara (1438), then to Florence (1439), where a short-lived union with the Greek Church was effected, the Greeks accepting the council's definition of controverted points. The Council of Basle is only ecumenical till the end of the twenty-fifth session, and of its decrees Eugene IV approved only such as dealt with the extirpation of heresy, the peace of Christendom, and the reform of the Church, and which at the same time did not derogate from the rights of the Holy See.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/06111a.htm
XVIII. FIFTH LATERAN COUNCIL
Years: 1512-1517
Summary: The Fifth Lateran Council sat from 1512 to 1517 under Popes Julius II and Leo X, the emperor being Maximilian I. Fifteen cardinals and about eighty archbishops and bishops took part in it. Its decrees are chiefly disciplinary. A new crusade against the Turks was also planned, but came to naught, owing to the religious upheaval in Germany caused by Luther.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/09018b.htm
XIX. COUNCIL OF TRENT
Years: 1545-1563
Summary: The Council of Trent lasted eighteen years (1545-1563) under five popes: Paul III, Julius III, Marcellus II, Paul IV and Pius IV, and under the Emperors Charles V and Ferdinand. There were present 5 cardinal legates of the Holy See, 3 patriarchs, 33 archbishops, 235 bishops, 7 abbots, 7 generals of monastic orders, and 160 doctors of divinity. It was convoked to examine and condemn the errors promulgated by Luther and other Reformers, and to reform the discipline of the Church. Of all councils it lasted longest, issued the largest number of dogmatic and reformatory decrees, and produced the most beneficial results.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/15030c.htm
XX. FIRST VATICAN COUNCIL
Years: 1869-1870
Summary: The Vatican Council was summoned by Pius IX. It met 8 December, 1869, and lasted till 18 July, 1870, when it was adjourned; it is still (1908) unfinished. There were present 6 archbishop-princes, 49 cardinals, 11 patriarchs, 680 archbishops and bishops, 28 abbots, 29 generals of orders, in all 803. Besides important canons relating to the Faith and the constitution of the Church, the council decreed the infallibility of the pope when speaking ex cathedra, i.e. when as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church.
Further Reading: www.newadvent.org/cathen/15303a.htm
XXI. SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL
Years: 1962-1965
Source: The Catholic Encyclopedia
http://thekingpin68.blogspot.com/2008/02/propaganda-and-promoganda.html
I favor the second option too. I really enjoy soccer (or more properly, football), but sometimes it's just far too melodramatic for me. The faked injuries, all this whining about the guy having poor sportsmanship, etc. People take sports too seriously. Sure, it's their "job", but that doesn't necessitate stone-cold sobriety. Games are intended to be fun. I like good competition just as much as the next guy, but I like to laugh too. And this did it for me.
ReplyDeleteI've studied some of the ecumenical councils in church history classes, and I don't know if those after the Second Council of Nicea can properly be termed "ecumenical". The Eastern Orthodox Church certainly does not recognize them as such, and their representation at those councils was few or not at all. That whole church council thing is quite interesting, how much of a role they've played in shaping the Church in Europe.
Thanks, Jake. Good insights in my opinion. I should clarify.
ReplyDeleteI agree that football has a lot of shenanigans, and that it is taken too seriously by many, especially in Europe and South America.
I don't know if those after the Second Council of Nicea can properly be termed "ecumenical".
I accept your point, Jake, and had similar thoughts. I try to stay true to the source I am using and therefore used the title provided. I do not always fully endorse the material I provide in italics for information purposes. I will make it more clear in my text that the Councils are from a Roman Catholic perspective. These are historical Ecumenical Councils in a limited and not exhaustive sense. Ecumenical means the entire inhabited earth/worldwide from the Greek, according to Grenz, Guretzki, and Nordling (1999: 43). I borrowed the text from a Roman Catholic site and the Catholic Encyclopedia, and the Councils take on a more of Roman Catholic theme over time. But, I reason that there is a still a useful and notable historical continuation in these Councils even as Eastern Orthodoxy and Protestants divided from the Roman Catholic Church taking away from the universal authority of these Councils. So, I listed them as Ecumenical Councils staying true to the source realizing that the Councils became less authoritative over time. Vatican II, for example, has little impact on Protestants. There was of course the final Western and Eastern church schism in 1054 and according to Cairns, neither of the two churches desire any ecumenical church accept on its own terms. Cairns (1981: 206). There was also the Protestant Reformation which Cairns suggests could be listed as taking place between 1517 and 1648 in regard to the creation of national churches or 1517 to 1545 for the creation of national Protestant churches. Cairns (1981: 277).
CAIRNS, EARLE E. (1981) Christianity Through The Centuries, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House.
GRENZ, STANLEY J., DAVID GURETZKI AND CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press.
Cool. Thanks for the clarification.
ReplyDeleteI took a course in college on the history and theology of Eastern Orthodoxy, and it has remained a big interest of mine since, so I think I approach things like that with a bit of a bias... :)
I visited an Eastern Orthodox Church for my PhD questionnaire work, and I wrote an article on Eastern Orthodoxy in the April 2007 thekingpin68 archives. A lady did not like what I wrote and told me so in comments!;) To me with the Ecumenical Councils, from what I have read, and again I am still learning, they appear to significantly lose levels of authority with the schisms I mentioned and that of course includes the one with the Eastern Church.
ReplyDeleteRuss:)
A real-life snippet of email conversation (anonymized):
ReplyDeletea friend: how many tix can u get Jack? two for Honey and I ? i have cash now as i was just paid today.
thnx eh.
my reply: We're in assigned seating. So you may as well just get them yourself. Or do you not have a valid credit card?
Perhaps he/she is in too much debt to have a credit card.
ReplyDeletehey dude, thanks for contacting me. sure, i'm up for a link exchange, my link list could use a refresher, is there a particular one of your sites you want me linking to?
ReplyDeleteThanks Lon.
ReplyDeleteIf you wish I will reciprocally link Solar Crash with both of my theological blogs.
Please verify.
Russ:)
Soccer is played by athletes and is also an enjoyment to the fans. Why not display your skill and give the fans a little show? If the other team does not like it, go get the ball!! If you can!
ReplyDelete-Super Socco-
I saw your comics on "KingPinned"
ReplyDeletewhat an incredible collection. I enjoy the many issues that have the big name super heroes on the covers...great art!
-Jimmy Olson-
Mr.Socco, thank you, and I take it you think Nani was just having a little fun and not being a sore winner.
ReplyDeleteBig Jim, cheers!
Nani was just having fun. He said later on that he used to do the same in Portugal.
ReplyDeleteNani was just entertaining the crowd in my opinion. I don't see what the big fuss was about, I personally enjoyed it
Costanzo, thank you and I appreciate the input.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you.
Russ